Skip to main content

Security report for reverta.lv

likvidējamā akciju sabiedrība “Reverta” · Finance · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents AS "Reverta", a Latvian government-related liquidating joint-stock company specializing in managing problematic financial assets and real estate. It evolved from the former Parex Bank and operates under the ownership of SIA Publisko aktīvu pārvaldītājs Possessor. The site provides detailed business information, contact details, and links to official documents, reflecting a transparent and professional government entity. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Maps API and Bootstrap, ensuring good mobile optimization and accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and privacy policies are lacking. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration analysis, but the official .gov.lv domain and consistent business data support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-structured, trustworthy, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reverta.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reverta.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reverta.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

AS "Reverta" holds a niche market position as a state-owned entity managing legacy problematic assets from a former bank, focusing on credit restructuring, debt collection, and real estate management. Its business model is asset liquidation and management under government oversight, targeting public sector stakeholders and financial institutions. The company benefits from strong trust signals due to its government affiliation and transparent communication. The website supports this by providing comprehensive business descriptions and official contact channels. There is no indication of commercial advertising or aggressive marketing, aligning with its public service role. The presence on social media platforms indicates engagement with broader audiences and stakeholders.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and secure form practices. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not appear to collect sensitive user data beyond a basic search form. GDPR compliance indicators are minimal due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Incident response contact points are not publicly available, which could hinder timely reporting of security issues. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational site but could be enhanced with formal policies and headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and APIs for security vulnerabilities and update dependencies.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding structured data and metadata for better indexing and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
likvidējamā akciju sabiedrība “Reverta”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
likvidējamā akciju sabiedrība “Reverta”
Description
AS "Reverta" is a liquidating joint-stock company, formerly AS "Parex banka", transformed into a professional problem asset management company. It manages credit restructuring, debt collection, and real estate transactions. The company is majority-owned (96.89%) and is in liquidation process since 2017.
Key services
Credit restructuring, Debt collection, Real estate purchase and sale, Real estate leasing and management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Maps API, MarkerClustererPlus, Polyfill.io, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the analyzed page.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  5. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain registration analysis.
  6. Website uses modern frontend technologies and external APIs.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn official pages.
  9. Content is focused on liquidation and management of problematic assets related to former Parex Bank.
  10. No forms with sensitive data collection detected except a search form with minimal input.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Maps API for geolocation features, and polyfills for browser compatibility. The presence of marker clustering scripts indicates interactive map features. The site is hosted on a government domain with SSL/TLS properly configured, ensuring secure communications. Performance is moderate with no obvious bottlenecks, and mobile optimization is good. No CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected from the HTML content. The site lacks advanced analytics or tracking scripts, indicating a focus on privacy. Technical debt appears low, but the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests room for modernization in security and compliance aspects.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reverta.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reverta.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.