Skip to main content

Security report for rettungsdienst-aurich.de

Rettungsdienst Landkreis Aurich gGmbH · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rettungsdienst Aurich is a regional emergency medical service provider operating in Landkreis Aurich, Germany, with over 40 years of experience. The organization offers critical services including emergency rescue, patient transport, emergency doctor transport, and intensive care transport across eight strategically located stations. Their website reflects a well-established business model focused on healthcare and transportation services for the local population. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized and provides good user experience and navigation clarity. However, performance is moderate and accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate but lacks several security headers and does not publish privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance trust and security posture. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended to align with modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rettungsdienst-aurich.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a key emergency medical service provider in Landkreis Aurich, with a long operational history since 1976. Their business model is non-profit and service-oriented, focusing on public health and safety. The target audience includes residents and patients requiring urgent medical assistance and transport. The organization emphasizes quality management, staff training, and process standardization. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly mentioned. The website content and structured data reinforce the company's credibility and regional focus.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and best security practices. The organization should consider implementing a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident handling readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Add a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and performance optimization for better user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rettungsdienst Landkreis Aurich gGmbH
Description
Seit über 40 Jahren medizinische Versorgung im Landkreis Aurich. Medizinische Notfallversorgung, Krankentransport, Notarzt- und Intensivtransport im Landkreis Aurich mit acht Standorten.
Key services
Notfallrettung (Emergency rescue), Krankentransport (Patient transport), Notarzttransport (Emergency doctor transport), Intensivtransport (Intensive care transport)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Elementor 3.24.0, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Font Awesome 5.15.3, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of latest WordPress and plugins versions

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in German and focused on emergency medical services in Landkreis Aurich.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No contact emails found in the HTML content; phone numbers are present in text but not in explicit contact sections.
  5. No forms detected for contact or data collection on the main page.
  6. Use of modern WordPress and Elementor technologies indicates a maintained site.
  7. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  10. Site uses HTTPS and has a valid SSL certificate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO plugin, ensuring ease of content management and SEO optimization. The tech stack includes jQuery and Font Awesome for UI elements, and Swiper.js for slideshows. Hosting appears to be managed via domaincontrol.com nameservers, likely GoDaddy. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with some inline CSS and JavaScript. No critical technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but improvements in accessibility and security configurations are advisable.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rettungsdienst-aurich.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rettungsdienst-aurich.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.