Skip to main content

Security report for retroville.ua

RETROVILLE · Retail · Ukraine

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RETROVILLE is a large lifestyle shopping and entertainment center located in Kyiv, Ukraine, offering a wide range of services including shopping, dining, entertainment, sports, and business center facilities. The website presents a modern, well-structured digital presence with good mobile optimization and user experience. It leverages popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks some advanced security headers and visible security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which is a notable gap given the tracking technologies in use. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the business location and nature. Overall, the website is professional and credible but should improve privacy and security transparency to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retroville.ua

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RETROVILLE positions itself as a premier lifestyle and retail destination in Kyiv, targeting local consumers and visitors seeking a comprehensive shopping and entertainment experience. The business model includes retail leasing, food and beverage services, entertainment, and office space rental. The website content and structure support a strong brand presence with consistent messaging and clear navigation. The use of advanced marketing and tracking tools suggests a focus on customer engagement and data-driven marketing. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found, indicating an independent operation. The business appears well-established with a large physical footprint and diverse service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and includes CSRF token meta tags, indicating attention to basic web security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks visible incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for security maturity and user trust. The use of third-party tracking scripts without accompanying privacy disclosures presents a compliance risk under GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with enhanced headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security.
  3. Provide visible incident response contact information and consider publishing a security.txt file for vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking technologies to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RETROVILLE
Description
ТРЦ Retroville — це перший у Києві сучасний багатофункціональний торгово-розважальний центр із lifestyle концепцією. Зручне розташування, містка паркінг-зона, сучасне і комфортне планування. Пропонує шопінг, розваги, ресторани, спорт, бізнес-центр, новини та акції.
Key services
Шопінг, Розваги, Ресторани, Спорт, Бізнес-центр
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Swiper.js (slider), jQuery (implied by plugins), Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token meta tag present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  3. Contact information limited to phone numbers; no emails or physical addresses explicitly found.
  4. Strong use of tracking and analytics scripts without visible privacy disclosures.
  5. Good mobile optimization and user experience.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. WHOIS data consistent and supports business legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front-end with Swiper.js for sliders and integrates Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. No explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Performance appears moderate with lazy loading of images and asynchronous script loading. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Hosting details were not identified from the provided data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retroville.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retroville.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.