Skip to main content

Security report for retetefeldefel.ro

Claus Web SRL · Media · Romania

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Retetefeldefel.ro is a Romanian-language culinary recipe website operated by Claus Web SRL, established in 2014. The site offers a wide range of simple and accessible recipes targeting amateur cooks and food enthusiasts in Romania. It maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels and uses structured data to enhance search engine visibility. The business model primarily relies on content publishing monetized through multiple advertising networks and programmatic bidding platforms. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and OneSignal for push notifications, hosted behind Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The website is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching retetefeldefel.ro

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention retetefeldefel.ro, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for retetefeldefel.ro right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector focusing on culinary content for Romanian speakers. Its competitive advantage lies in localized content and a broad recipe catalog. Revenue streams are mainly advertising-based, leveraging multiple ad networks and real-time bidding. The target audience includes home cooks and culinary hobbyists. The site shows growth potential through social media engagement and content diversification. However, the absence of explicit privacy and security policies may impact user trust and compliance with regulations. The partnership ecosystem includes advertising and marketing service providers but no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks several security best practices such as comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options), published privacy policies, terms of service, and vulnerability disclosure policies. No incident response contacts or data protection officer information is available, indicating limited formal security governance. The use of multiple third-party scripts and ad networks increases the attack surface, necessitating regular security audits. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by addressing compliance gaps and enhancing security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add clear contact information for security incidents and designate a data protection officer if applicable.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and advertising integrations to minimize security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Claus Web SRL
Description
Retete culinare simple, rapide si la indemana oricui. Aici puteti gasi retete vegetariene, retete sanatoase, retete de post, retete simple, la indemana oricarui bucatar amator.
Key services
Publishing culinary recipes, Providing cooking tips and culinary advice, Advertising space for monetization
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 2.1.3, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Google Publisher Tags (GPT), Prebid.js, Cxense, OneSignal Web Push, CookiePro Consent Management
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of service workers for push notifications with OneSignal

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Clicky, Cxense
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ad Manager, Adform, Criteo, Smart Ad Server, The Trade Desk (TTD), sspBC
Tracking pixels
Tapad, Cxense, Clicky
Marketing tools
OneSignal Push Notifications
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Romanian culinary recipe portal with rich content and active social media presence.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with CookiePro and OneTrust scripts.
  4. Advertising is heavily integrated with multiple ad networks and programmatic bidders.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and WordPress CMS.
  6. No direct contact information or security policies published on the site.
  7. SSL is properly configured and enforced.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Google Fonts, and advanced advertising technologies like Prebid.js and Google Publisher Tags. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and lazy loading techniques implemented. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced. The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a data-driven approach. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts and lack of some security headers, which should be addressed to reduce exposure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with retetefeldefel.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review retetefeldefel.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.