Skip to main content

Security report for resupply.fi

1337 Services LLC · Finance · Saint Kitts and Nevis

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Resupply is a decentralized stablecoin protocol that enables users to supply crvUSD or frxUSD stablecoins to lending markets such as Curve Lend or Fraxlend and borrow reUSD stablecoins against those positions. The protocol aims to maximize yield for DeFi users by allowing collateralized borrowing with minimal volatility risk, supported by an insurance pool to safeguard the protocol. It is positioned as a niche player in the DeFi stablecoin lending space with partnerships from established projects like Convex and Yearn. The website is built on modern web technologies including Next.js and Material-UI, with integrations for popular Web3 wallets, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and peer-reviewed smart contracts, though explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the platform presents a professional and trustworthy front with moderate business credibility and technical maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching resupply.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Resupply targets DeFi users interested in stablecoin lending and borrowing, leveraging partnerships with Convex, Yearn, Curve, and Fraxlend to enhance credibility and market reach. The business model focuses on yield maximization through collateralized borrowing and protocol incentives via RSUP token rewards. The recent domain registration aligns with the startup nature of the project. The absence of direct contact information and privacy policies suggests room for maturity in compliance and customer support. The ecosystem integration and insurance pool provide competitive advantages in risk management. Growth potential depends on adoption within the DeFi community and continued partnership development.

Security posture

The protocol employs immutable, non-custodial smart contracts reviewed by top auditors, indicating a high security standard in core operations. The website uses HTTPS but lacks explicit security headers such as CSP and HSTS, which are recommended to enhance web security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the website content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response plan is a gap in transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no GDPR or cookie consent mechanisms evident. Overall, the security posture is solid for a DeFi protocol but could benefit from improved web security practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response plan to increase transparency and preparedness.
  4. Provide clear contact information for support and security incident reporting to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure program to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
1337 Services LLC
Registration number
14625
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
1337 Services LLC
Description
A decentralized stablecoin protocol, leveraging the liquidity and stability of lending markets. Users supply crvUSD or frxUSD to Curve Lend or Fraxlend and borrow reUSD stablecoins using those lending positions as collateral at attractive rates.
Key services
Stablecoin lending, Stablecoin borrowing, Yield maximization via collateralized borrowing, Insurance pool for protocol safety
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Material-UI, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js, Material-UI
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Non-custodial smart contracts
  • Peer and top security auditor reviews

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers provided on the website.
  4. Strong focus on decentralized finance stablecoin lending and borrowing.
  5. Partnerships with well-known DeFi projects enhance trust.
  6. Modern web technologies and wallet integrations used.
  7. Security best practices partially implemented but could be improved with explicit policies and headers.
  8. No advertising or tracking detected.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and Material-UI frameworks, leveraging React for frontend rendering. It integrates with popular Web3 wallets such as Gnosis Safe, WalletConnect, and Coinbase Wallet, indicating readiness for blockchain interactions. The site is moderately performant with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a DeFi protocol, though there is opportunity to enhance accessibility and security headers. The site uses skeleton loaders for dynamic data, indicating asynchronous data fetching and a responsive UI design.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with resupply.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review resupply.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.