Skip to main content

Security report for resto65.lv

Resto 65 · Hospitality · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Resto 65 is a Latvian restaurant specializing in European and Asian cuisine, offering meals throughout the day including breakfast, lunch, and dinner in a cozy atmosphere. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile optimization, built on the Vigbo CMS platform. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and privacy policy documentation. No contact emails or phone numbers are provided, which may impact customer trust and compliance. Overall, the site serves its business purpose well but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching resto65.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local customers seeking diverse culinary options in a restaurant setting. Its flexible menu and cozy ambiance position it as a neighborhood hospitality provider. The website content is consistent and professional, but lacks detailed business credentials or certifications. The absence of contact details and privacy documentation suggests room for maturity in customer engagement and regulatory compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model is straightforward hospitality service without e-commerce or complex digital services.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS, indicating basic transport security. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, which are recommended best practices. The cookie consent banner is present, supporting GDPR compliance efforts, but no privacy policy or incident response contacts are found. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting marketing insights. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy assessment. Overall, security maturity is basic with recommendations to enhance header policies, privacy documentation, and contact transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident communication.
  4. Consider adding terms of service and incident response information to enhance transparency.
  5. Monitor WHOIS data availability and ensure domain registration details are accessible for trust verification.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Resto 65
Description
Resto 65 is a restaurant offering popular and delicious dishes from European and Asian cuisines. It adapts flexibly to visitors' preferences and lifestyles, serving energizing breakfasts, lunch meals, and relaxing dinners in a cozy atmosphere suitable for celebrations and everyday dining. The service philosophy emphasizes professional staff, quality ingredients, and a touch of love to ensure maximum gastronomic enjoyment.
Key services
Breakfast, Lunch, Dinner, European and Asian cuisine, Banquet offers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Google Fonts, vigbo.tech CDN, Custom CSS and JS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by https URL)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  6. Website uses Vigbo CMS and related CDN infrastructure.
  7. Content is in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  10. No social media links or business certifications found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Vigbo CMS with jQuery 3.3.1 and Google Fonts integration. It uses CDN resources from vigbo.tech domains for static content delivery. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is minimal with meta tags and Open Graph tags but no structured JSON-LD data. No analytics or marketing tools are detected, indicating a simple technical footprint. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with resto65.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review resto65.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.