Skip to main content

Security report for respecta.fi

Respecta Oy · Healthcare · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Respecta Oy is a Finnish healthcare company specializing in assistive devices, prosthetics, and health technology solutions. The company serves both individual consumers and organizations, offering products, rental services, rehabilitation, and ergonomic solutions. The website reflects a mature market position with comprehensive service offerings and a strong local presence in Finland. Technically, the website uses modern JavaScript libraries and third-party tools such as Usercentrics for cookie consent and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, privacy compliance evident, and no critical vulnerabilities detected. The website is professionally designed with excellent content quality and navigation, supporting a high trustworthiness rating. Overall, the site demonstrates a well-managed online presence aligned with business goals and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching respecta.fi

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Respecta operates in the healthcare sector focusing on assistive technology and rehabilitation services. Its business model includes direct sales, rentals, and consulting services targeting both consumers and institutional clients. The company maintains partnerships with several reputable international assistive technology manufacturers, enhancing its product portfolio and market reach. The presence of educational and rehabilitation partners suggests a strategic ecosystem approach. The website content and structure support customer engagement and trust, with clear contact information and active social media channels. The company appears medium-sized with a stable market position in Finland, leveraging digital tools for marketing and customer service.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and security headers present. Privacy compliance is well-managed through Usercentrics cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information is noted as a gap. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and Leadoo chatbot is managed but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security measures are appropriate for the business type, with room for improvement in formal security documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and controls.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Respecta Oy
Description
Tarjoamme korkealaatuisia apuväline- ja terveysteknologiaratkaisuja sekä ammattitaitoista palvelua.
Key services
Apuvälineet (assistive devices), Proteesit (prosthetics), Kuntoutuspalvelut (rehabilitation services), Vuokrauspalvelut (rental services), Ergonomiaratkaisut (ergonomic solutions)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Flexslider, Usercentrics CMP, Google Tag Manager, ReadSpeaker, Leadoo chatbot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Usercentrics for privacy compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Leadoo chatbot, Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive product and service offerings in healthcare assistive technology
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with Usercentrics integration
  4. Active social media presence with multiple verified platforms
  5. No critical security issues detected
  6. Good use of third-party tools for accessibility and user engagement
  7. No evidence of suspicious or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Flexslider for UI components, and Usercentrics for consent management, indicating a moderately modern tech stack. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tags. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and preconnect hints for external domains. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with respecta.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review respecta.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.