Skip to main content

Security report for respect.cz

RESPECT, a.s. · Finance · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RESPECT, a.s. is a well-established Czech insurance brokerage firm specializing in tailored insurance solutions for businesses across multiple sectors including manufacturing, hospitality, technology, and agriculture. With over 30 years of experience and a large team of insurance experts, the company offers comprehensive risk management and claims handling services. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and multilingual support. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and integrates analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and BizMachine WebTracks. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response information are absent. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trust slightly but does not detract from the overall legitimacy supported by detailed business content and client testimonials.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of respect.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching respect.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
62
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RESPECT holds a strong market position as a specialized insurance broker for B2B clients, leveraging a large expert team and international reach. Their business model focuses on customized insurance programs and risk management consulting, targeting medium to large enterprises. The company demonstrates growth and stability through extensive client references and a broad service portfolio. Partnerships with digital service providers and a dedicated client portal enhance customer engagement. The absence of public WHOIS data suggests privacy protection or registration issues, which should be monitored. Overall, RESPECT's business intelligence indicates a reputable and mature organization with a focus on quality service and client trust.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, indicating compliance with privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency for security incidents. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools is balanced with privacy compliance. To improve, RESPECT should publish security policies, incident response procedures, and consider a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting. These steps would enhance security maturity and client trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  3. Add incident response contact information and vulnerability disclosure guidelines on the website.
  4. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no privacy or security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RESPECT, a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RESPECT, a.s.
Description
Česká pojišťovací makléřská skupina s více než 30 lety zkušeností, zaměřená na pojištění firem a podnikatelů s důrazem na risk management a likvidaci škod.
Key services
Pojištění firemních rizik, Risk management, Likvidační servis pojistných událostí, Specializované pojistné programy pro různé průmyslové segmenty
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, Google Tag Manager, BizMachine WebTracks analytics, Lenis smooth scrolling, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts
Frameworks
StimulusJS (data-controller attributes), GSAP (parallax effects)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, BizMachine WebTracks
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
BizMachine WebTracks
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible privacy protection or domain registration issue.
  3. Strong presence of business trust indicators including client testimonials and long history.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. Multiple external trusted domains used for fonts, analytics, and social media.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and insurance focused.
  9. Modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools used.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including ES modules, StimulusJS for frontend controllers, GSAP for animations, and integrates Google Tag Manager and BizMachine WebTracks for analytics. Fonts are loaded from Typekit and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and smooth scrolling. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing large images and scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Accessibility features are present but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and landmarks. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with respect.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review respect.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.