Skip to main content

Security report for reseau-le-saint.com

Le Saint Network · Retail · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Le Saint Network operates as a distributor specializing in fresh products including fruits, vegetables, seafood, flowers, fresh meat, hygiene products, and wine. The company maintains a network of brands and purchasing offices across France, targeting B2B clients in retail and food distribution sectors. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, incorporating modern web technologies and standard analytics tools such as Google Analytics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures in place, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain registration transparency, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and safe, but could improve transparency and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reseau-le-saint.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
75
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a medium-sized wholesale distributor in the retail sector, with a diversified portfolio of brands covering various fresh product categories. Its business model focuses on regional distribution networks and specialized purchasing offices, enabling it to serve a broad range of clients. The presence of multiple brand domains and partner sites indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on B2B customers, emphasizing quality and local engagement. Growth indicators include a comprehensive brand network and recruitment links, signaling ongoing expansion. Strategic observations highlight the importance of enhancing domain registration transparency and formalizing security and privacy policies to strengthen market credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and several security headers present, contributing to a secure browsing experience. The use of CleanTalk anti-spam plugin helps mitigate spam risks on forms. However, the lack of visible security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates room for improvement in security governance and transparency. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is only basic, with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking comprehensive details. The overall security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business type but requiring enhancements to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact information.
  2. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data retention practices.
  3. Obtain and display domain registration details or use verified WHOIS information to improve trust.
  4. Improve accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Le Saint Network
Description
Le Saint Network is a distributor specializing in fresh products including fruits, vegetables, seafood, flowers, fresh meat, hygiene and tableware products, and wine. It operates a network of brands and purchasing offices across various regions in France.
Key services
Distribution of fresh fruits and vegetables, Seafood distribution, Flower distribution, Fresh meat distribution, Hygiene and tableware products, Wine distribution
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, CleanTalk Anti-Spam
Frameworks
Astra Theme, Elementor Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anti-spam plugin (CleanTalk)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is business-oriented and professionally presented.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked.
  7. Uses modern WordPress technologies and plugins.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using the Astra theme and Elementor page builder, which provides flexibility and responsive design. It leverages jQuery and integrates Google Analytics for traffic monitoring. The site loads with moderate performance, with no critical errors or broken elements detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation menus. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is standard for medium-sized business websites, with opportunities to optimize performance and enhance security headers further. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, which could be relevant for risk assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reseau-le-saint.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reseau-le-saint.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.