Skip to main content

Security report for repsol.pt

Repsol · Energy · Portugal

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Repsol Portugal operates as a major energy supplier providing electricity, gas, and related services to individual consumers. The website is well-branded and professionally designed, targeting retail customers with a clear focus on energy solutions and customer benefits. The technical infrastructure leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Tag Manager, Adobe Web SDK, and Gigya, and employs security best practices such as HTTPS and reCAPTCHA. However, the absence of explicit privacy and terms of service policies on the accessible pages indicates room for improvement in compliance transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong with proper headers and no detected vulnerabilities, but privacy compliance could be enhanced by publishing comprehensive policies and contact points for incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain:

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching repsol.pt

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
80
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Repsol holds a strong market position in the Portuguese energy sector, offering a diversified portfolio including electricity, gas, gas bottles, and electric mobility services. The business model is retail-focused, targeting individual consumers with digital self-service portals and customer benefits programs. The website's integration with advanced marketing and analytics platforms suggests a mature digital marketing strategy. The company maintains consistent branding and trust signals, although direct contact information and legal disclosures are not prominently found in the provided content. The presence of social media links to official Repsol accounts supports brand legitimacy and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and bot protection via reCAPTCHA. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency for security governance. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. Overall, the site is secure but could benefit from enhanced documentation of security and privacy practices to build greater user trust and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a detailed privacy policy page accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy documents to improve legal transparency.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Implement structured data markup for better SEO and content discoverability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Repsol
Description
Repsol is an energy company providing electricity, gas, gas bottles, electric mobility, and related services to individual customers in Portugal.
Key services
Electricity and Gas supply, Gas Bottles, Service Stations, Electric Mobility, Customer Benefits, My Repsol customer portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Adobe Web SDK, Gigya, reCAPTCHA v2 and v3
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Adobe Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Adobe Web SDK, Gigya
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded for Repsol Portugal.
  2. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  4. Multiple analytics and marketing scripts are used, indicating extensive user tracking.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and various Adobe and Google marketing SDKs. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses canonical URLs and meta tags for SEO. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were identified in the provided content. Hosting details are not explicit but the presence of Adobe and Google services suggests a robust infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with repsol.pt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review repsol.pt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.