Skip to main content

Security report for repromeda.cz

Repromeda · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Repromeda is a healthcare provider specializing in assisted reproduction and infertility treatment, serving primarily the Czech Republic and surrounding regions through multiple localized websites. The company has a strong market presence, having helped bring over 6000 children into the world, indicating a well-established position in the fertility treatment sector. Their website is professionally designed using WordPress and Elementor, with multilingual support and SEO optimization, targeting individuals and couples seeking fertility assistance. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA for form security, and Leaflet.js for map functionalities. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trustworthiness, but the website's content and social media presence support its legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and anti-bot measures in place, but the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies are areas for enhancement. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no clear privacy policy or terms of service detected. Overall, Repromeda presents a credible and professional online presence in the healthcare sector, with recommendations to improve transparency, security headers, and privacy documentation to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching repromeda.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Repromeda operates in the healthcare sector focusing on assisted reproduction, targeting a niche but critical market segment of infertility treatment. Their business model revolves around providing specialized medical services, supported by a network of regional partner websites in multiple European countries, indicating a broad geographic reach. The company leverages digital marketing and SEO to attract patients, supported by active social media channels. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from their market credibility. The company likely generates revenue through medical treatments and consultations, with growth potential in expanding regional services and digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting forms against automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests incomplete implementation of best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts indicates a gap in transparency and preparedness. Compliance with GDPR is implied but not explicitly documented. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the healthcare sector but would benefit from enhanced header configurations and clear security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and disclose incident response procedures and security contact channels to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Improve accessibility features to ensure compliance with standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Repromeda
Description
Jsme vaším průvodcem na cestě k úplné rodině. Tým našich odborníků vám poskytne komplexní léčbu neplodnosti. Pomohli jsme na svět již 6000 dětí.
Key services
Assisted reproduction treatments, Infertility diagnosis and therapy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Fluent Forms, Jet Engine, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Leaflet.js
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Google reCAPTCHA implemented on forms
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Seznam.cz analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Seznam.cz tracking
Marketing tools
Optimonk
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich focused on assisted reproduction healthcare services.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and may indicate privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the main page or linked content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is present and functional.
  5. Multiple language versions of the site exist, indicating international presence.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices observed.
  7. No obvious security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content snippet.
  9. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Elementor page builder, supported by plugins such as Yoast SEO and Fluent Forms for SEO and form management respectively. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing scripts. The presence of Leaflet.js indicates use of interactive maps. Performance is moderate with preconnect hints and resource preloading implemented. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design and adaptive layouts. Accessibility is basic, with potential improvements in ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with repromeda.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review repromeda.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.