Skip to main content

Security report for rephop.com

Rephop · Finance · Denmark

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rephop is a specialized SaaS provider offering web-based group consolidation, reporting, and planning software tailored for CFOs and finance professionals. Established in 2013, it has positioned itself as a trusted solution for simplifying complex financial consolidation processes across multiple subsidiaries and currencies. The platform emphasizes ease of use, powerful features such as intergroup transaction reconciliation, non-controlling interest calculations, and compliance with IFRS and US GAAP standards. Its market presence is supported by customer testimonials and a clear pricing model targeting small to medium-sized businesses and enterprises. Technically, Rephop leverages modern web technologies including Next.js and React, hosted on Vercel with Cloudflare DNS services. The website is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Analytics tools such as Vercel Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for user behavior tracking, though privacy compliance could be enhanced with explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security or incident response policies. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data confirms a consistent and legitimate domain registration history aligned with the company's operational timeline. Overall, Rephop demonstrates a strong business and technical foundation with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC to bolster trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rephop.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Rephop operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on financial consolidation software delivered as a SaaS product. Its competitive advantage lies in simplifying complex group reporting tasks with automation and compliance features. Revenue streams are subscription-based with tiered pricing according to entity count and user access. The target market includes CFOs and finance teams in startups, SMEs, and large enterprises requiring multi-entity consolidation. The company maintains an active social media presence and showcases client logos and testimonials to build credibility. Growth indicators include 8+ years of operation and a global customer base. The partnership ecosystem includes social media platforms and cloud hosting providers but no direct partner domains were identified.

Security posture

Rephop exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection in place. The absence of DNSSEC is a minor gap that could be addressed to improve DNS security. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the lack of explicit security policies and incident response contact information limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is partially met with a comprehensive privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. The use of reputable hosting and DNS providers adds to the security strength. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with clearer policies and technical DNS protections.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page including contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS integrity and prevent spoofing attacks.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user data handling practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rephop
Description
Rephop is simple to use, web-based group consolidation, reporting and planning software. An entirely new way to see and use your financial information.
Key services
Group consolidation, Financial reporting, Planning and forecasting, Currency translation, Non-controlling interest calculation, Intergroup transaction reconciliation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Vercel Analytics, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited status on domain
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Vercel Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Vercel Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus on financial consolidation software.
  2. Content is rich and well structured with detailed features, pricing, testimonials, and FAQs.
  3. No signs of blocking or WAF challenges; full content accessible.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service are present and comprehensive.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and hosting on Vercel platform.
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Twitter (X), Facebook, and Medium.
  9. Pricing plans clearly detailed with entity and user limits.
  10. Contact information limited to support email; no phone or physical address found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js and React frameworks, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. Hosting on Vercel ensures fast global delivery and good performance metrics. The site includes accessibility features and is mobile optimized, providing a positive user experience across devices. SEO is supported by comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for software application and organization. The use of Cloudflare DNS adds resilience and security, though DNSSEC is not enabled. Analytics integration is moderate, balancing user insights with privacy considerations. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust with minor areas for enhancement in security and privacy tooling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rephop.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rephop.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.