Skip to main content

Security report for reparative.lv

SIA Reparative · Healthcare · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reparative is a small Latvian-based beauty and dermatology business specializing in non-invasive skin rejuvenation using HIVAMAT oscillatory massage and clinically formulated cosmetics. The company emphasizes scientific validation and long-lasting results without injections or trauma, targeting customers seeking effective and safe skin treatments. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear service descriptions, pricing, and an e-commerce platform for product sales. Technical infrastructure includes Mozello CMS, Amazon Cloudfront CDN, and common web libraries such as jQuery and Fancybox. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though security headers are not detected and could be improved. Privacy compliance is supported by a visible privacy policy and cookie banner. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, but the website's content and contact information indicate a legitimate and trustworthy business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reparative.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention reparative.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for reparative.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the healthcare and retail sectors, focusing on skin care and massage therapy services combined with product sales. It differentiates itself by offering a scientifically backed alternative to traditional cosmetic procedures, leveraging dermatologist expertise and VISIA skin diagnostics. The target market is primarily women in Riga seeking effective, non-invasive skin treatments. The business model combines direct service provision with online product sales. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram supports marketing efforts. The company appears small but professional, with consistent branding and clear trust signals such as clinical involvement and transparent pricing.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes client-side form validation and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, no HTTP security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) were detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the content. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file suggests room for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened with additional headers and documented policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security.
  2. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and incident response readiness.
  3. Regularly update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features, especially for forms and navigation, to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant certifications or trust badges to further boost business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Reparative
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Reparative
Description
Reparative is a beauty laboratory and HIVAMAT oscillatory massage cabinet offering clinically based skin rejuvenation without injections or trauma. Founded by dermatologist Anete Ezeriņa and massage specialist Ingrīda Pulvere, it combines scientific cosmetic formulations with oscillatory massage therapy to achieve lasting skin improvements.
Key services
HIVAMAT oscillatory massage therapy, Dermatologically formulated skincare products, Skin diagnostics and consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Mozello CMS scripts, Cloudfront CDN
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of cookie consent banner
  • Form validation with client-side checks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Engaga marketing tool, Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Latvian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  3. Clear business focus on non-invasive skin rejuvenation and dermatological cosmetics.
  4. Multiple forms with client-side validation for appointment booking.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and CDNs for performance.
  6. Cookie consent and privacy policy present indicating GDPR awareness.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram linked.
  8. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected; safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Mozello CMS and uses a modern tech stack including jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices with proper meta tags and structured content. Performance is moderate, benefiting from CDN usage but could be improved with further optimization. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but could be enhanced. The site uses client-side validation for forms but lacks advanced security headers. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reparative.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reparative.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.