Skip to main content

Security report for renomia.sk

RENOMIA, s.r.o. · Finance · Slovakia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENOMIA, s.r.o. is a Slovak-based financial intermediary specializing in risk management, insurance brokerage, claims handling, and employee benefits. The company serves a diverse clientele including businesses, entrepreneurs, municipalities, and professionals, positioning itself as a regional leader with a broad international network of subsidiaries and partners. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive business presence with clear service offerings and legal compliance. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and a proprietary CMS, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers could be improved. Overall, RENOMIA demonstrates a mature digital presence aligned with its business goals and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 0 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renomia.sk

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention renomia.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for renomia.sk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RENOMIA operates in multiple sectors including energy, transport, finance, real estate, manufacturing, agriculture, healthcare, and services. Its business model focuses on financial intermediation and insurance brokerage, supported by a network of subsidiaries and partner companies across Central and Eastern Europe. The company leverages digital tools for marketing and analytics, maintaining compliance with GDPR and providing transparent legal documentation. Its market positioning is strengthened by a diversified service portfolio and international reach, targeting corporate clients and individual customers. The presence of multiple related domains and partner sites indicates a well-established ecosystem supporting its operations.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, reflecting awareness of privacy and security standards. Security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and could be added to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. Forms use AJAX and validation, improving security and user experience. However, no explicit security policy or incident response contact information is provided, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional headers and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user inclusivity.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  5. Maintain transparency by providing data retention policies and detailed privacy compliance information.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RENOMIA, s.r.o.
Registration number
35 815 566
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENOMIA, s.r.o.
Description
Experti na riadenie rizík v oblasti poistenia služieb, podnikateľov, živnostníkov, priemyselných firiem, miest, obcí a profesijného poistenia.
Key services
risk management, insurance brokerage, claims handling, employee benefits, financial intermediation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookie Script, Modernizr, Solidpixels CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms with validation and AJAX

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong presence of legal and privacy documentation.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and user-friendly.
  4. Multiple international subsidiaries and partner sites indicate a broad business network.
  5. No security or content blocking detected.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn supports trust.
  7. Forms use AJAX and validation, enhancing user experience and security.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found on site.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Solidpixels CMS and uses modern JavaScript libraries including Modernizr and Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses a cookie consent solution from Cookie Script. The site is mobile optimized with responsive images and a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were detected, indicating a well-maintained technical infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renomia.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renomia.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.