Skip to main content

Security report for renomia.ro

RENOMIA · Finance · Romania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RENOMIA is an international insurance and reinsurance brokerage firm providing top-tier services to both individuals and companies. The company operates across multiple sectors including energy, transport, manufacturing, real estate, healthcare, agriculture, and technology. It maintains a strong market position with several subsidiaries and partner companies across Central and Eastern Europe. The website reflects a professional business model focused on insurance brokerage, risk management, and employee benefits, targeting a broad audience of corporate and individual clients primarily in Romania and neighboring countries. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, and a proprietary CMS platform, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and SEO best practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some security headers and explicit incident response information are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive GDPR policies and cookie management. Overall, RENOMIA's digital presence is professional and trustworthy, supporting its business credibility and international operations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching renomia.ro

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RENOMIA's business intelligence reveals a well-established insurance brokerage network with diversified services spanning multiple industries. The company leverages its subsidiaries to extend market reach and service specialization. Its competitive advantages include recognized industry awards, a broad portfolio of insurance solutions, and a strong online presence with multilingual support. Revenue streams likely derive from brokerage commissions, risk management consulting, and employee benefit programs. The target customer segments include corporate clients in specialized industries and individual policyholders. Growth indicators include international expansion and digital service offerings. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking RENOMIA with regional insurance and financial service providers. Strategic observations highlight the company's focus on comprehensive insurance solutions and risk advisory services tailored to diverse business sectors.

Security posture

The security posture of RENOMIA's website is mature with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact information limits transparency and readiness communication. Compliance with data protection regulations appears adequate, but formalizing vulnerability disclosure and incident response processes would enhance security culture and stakeholder trust. Overall, the site demonstrates a good security baseline appropriate for a financial services provider but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for reporting security issues.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards and improve user inclusivity.
  5. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve customer trust and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RENOMIA
Description
RENOMIA INSURANCE REINSURANCE BROKER este un furnizor international de servicii de top in domeniul asigurarilor, atat pentru persoane fizice, cat si companii.
Key services
insurance brokerage, risk management, employee benefits, international insurance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Modernizr, Cookie Script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookie Script
Marketing tools
Cookie Script
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is not disclosed due to ROTLD privacy policies.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main page.
  6. Strong social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn.
  7. Multiple international subsidiaries and partner sites linked.
  8. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No incident response or security policy pages detected.
  10. Content is professional and relevant to insurance brokerage and risk management.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (Solidpixels) and utilizes widely adopted technologies such as Google Tag Manager and Google Fonts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes SEO best practices such as meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no significant delays detected. The technical infrastructure supports multilingual content and integrates cookie consent management. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information available. The site could improve by adding more accessibility features and optimizing security headers. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with renomia.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review renomia.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.