Skip to main content

Security report for remote-sensing-solutions.com

Remote Sensing Solutions · Energy · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Remote Sensing Solutions is a German company specializing in Earth Observation and environmental monitoring services using advanced remote sensing and AI technologies. The company offers a range of services including forest and carbon monitoring, digital MRV, consulting, and AI platforms for transparency and verification. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern SEO and cookie compliance tools, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA integration, though some security headers and explicit privacy policies are missing. The absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details introduces some uncertainty about domain legitimacy, but the business content and client references suggest a reputable organization. Overall, the website is functional, informative, and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy transparency and contact information availability.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching remote-sensing-solutions.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a leading German provider in the environmental monitoring sector, leveraging 25 years of experience. Its business model focuses on delivering value-added services in forestry, climate projects, and sustainable resource management, targeting NGOs, government bodies, and private sector clients. The presence of client logos and multilingual support indicates a broad partnership ecosystem and international reach. The use of AI platforms and digital MRV solutions highlights innovation and adaptation to market demands. However, the lack of visible contact details and privacy policies may impact client trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security, indicating a baseline security awareness. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the absence of key security headers (e.g., CSP, HSTS) and lack of explicit privacy and security policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder transparency and trust in security incident handling. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a potential risk factor.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate commitment to security best practices.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated software components.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Remote Sensing Solutions
Description
Remote Sensing Solutions is one of Germany’s leading value-adding companies in Earth Observation. Their services are built upon cutting-edge remote sensing and AI technology. They offer services including forest and carbon monitoring, digital MRV, consulting, clean energy quantification, and AI platforms for transparency and verification.
Key services
Forest & Carbon Monitoring, Digital Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV), Consulting for sustainable resource management, AI Platform (VerifAId Transparency, Supply Chain, Forest Carbon), Clean Energy quantification and climate risk assessment
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.4.7, Yoast SEO plugin, Slider Revolution 5.4.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Google Analytics, Polylang (multilingual plugin), Contact Form 7, Cookie Law Info plugin, WP Responsive Menu
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA scripts
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a professional business site
  3. Uses modern WordPress CMS with SEO and cookie compliance plugins
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  5. Cookie consent banner is implemented
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage content
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No social media links explicitly found in header or footer
  9. Site is multilingual (English and German)
  10. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.4.7 with a modern tech stack including Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, and Contact Form 7. It uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Polylang for multilingual support. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance appears moderate with no major issues detected. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced frameworks beyond WordPress plugins are detected. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with remote-sensing-solutions.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review remote-sensing-solutions.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.