Skip to main content

Security report for reisebuero-lauffer.de

Reisebüro Lauffer Nierste & Colloff OHG · Hospitality · Germany

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reisebüro Lauffer Manuela Colloff is a small local travel agency based in Recklinghausen, Germany, specializing in personalized travel consultation and booking services including flights, cruises, and bus travel. The website presents a professional and user-friendly interface with clear contact information and service offerings, targeting general consumers seeking travel planning assistance. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Swiper.js, and integrates Google Maps and Matomo analytics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR requirements, with no signs of malicious content or vulnerabilities detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reisebuero-lauffer.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
64
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a traditional travel agency with a focus on personalized customer service and local market presence. Its business model revolves around travel consultation and booking, supported by digital tools like newsletters and online check-in services. The website's clear presentation of contact details and service options supports customer engagement and trust. While the agency appears small in size, its consistent branding and use of modern web technologies indicate a commitment to maintaining a professional online presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data, suggesting a standalone operation. The use of Matomo analytics indicates attention to privacy-conscious data collection.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response information, and advanced security headers, which are recommended best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party libraries appears current, but ongoing monitoring is advised. GDPR compliance is supported by the presence of a privacy policy and cookie management. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business website but could be enhanced with formal policies and improved header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Reisebüro Lauffer Nierste & Colloff OHG
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reisebüro Lauffer Nierste & Colloff OHG
Description
Reisebüro Lauffer Manuela Colloff is a travel agency offering personalized travel consultation and booking services for flights, cruises, and bus trips. They provide customer support for planning dream vacations.
Key services
Travel consultation, Flight booking, Cruise booking, Bus travel booking, Newsletter, Online check-in
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome 6, Swiper.js, Klaro (cookie consent), Google Maps API, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Newsletter
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local travel agency site with clear contact info and services.
  2. Good use of modern web technologies and cookie consent for GDPR compliance.
  3. No visible security policies or incident response info published.
  4. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  5. WHOIS data is limited but no inconsistencies found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely Dymapage, utilizing Bootstrap 4 for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It integrates several third-party libraries including FontAwesome 6 for icons, Swiper.js for sliders, Klaro for cookie consent, Google Maps API for location display, and Matomo for analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for a small business website, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Opportunities exist to enhance security headers and improve accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reisebuero-lauffer.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reisebuero-lauffer.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.