Skip to main content

Security report for reinsurance.org

Reinsurance Association of America · Finance · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) is a well-established trade association serving the U.S. reinsurance industry. It provides advocacy, education, legal research, analytics, and market intelligence to its members, positioning itself as a key industry resource. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with comprehensive content tailored to reinsurance professionals, regulators, and stakeholders. Technically, the site is built on a mature ASP.NET framework with Telerik UI components and integrates modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Azure Application Insights. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security-wise, while HTTPS is implied and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, explicit security headers are not visible in the provided data, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. The WHOIS data was unavailable from the raw output, which slightly impacts trust assessment, but the website's professional presentation and content quality support its legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, privacy compliance, and business credibility, with recommendations to enhance security headers and verify WHOIS information for full trust assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reinsurance.org

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RAA operates as an essential entity within the finance sector, specifically focusing on reinsurance. It serves a medium-sized organization with a strong market position as an industry advocate and educator. The business model centers on membership services including advocacy, education, and research. The website highlights partnerships with major reinsurance market players such as Gallagher Re, Aon, and Guy Carpenter, indicating a robust ecosystem. The presence of frequent events, press releases, and market reports suggests active engagement and growth. The target audience includes industry professionals, regulators, and insurers. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from the organization's credibility given its established presence and detailed content.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth strategies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site uses secure forms with anti-CSRF tokens implied by ASP.NET Web Forms standards. The integration of Azure Application Insights suggests monitoring capabilities. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced header configurations and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to improve domain transparency and trust.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards such as WCAG.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Reinsurance Association of America
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Reinsurance Association of America
Description
The Reinsurance Association of America (RAA) is a trade association representing the reinsurance industry in the United States. It provides advocacy, education, analytics, legal research, and market reports to support the reinsurance community. The organization hosts events and seminars focused on reinsurance contracts, claims, underwriting, finance, and catastrophe risk management.
Key services
Advocacy on regulatory and legislative issues, Educational seminars and events, Research tools and analytics, Legal research resources, Market reports and publications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
ASP.NET Web Forms, Telerik UI controls, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Azure Application Insights, Bootstrap (modal), AjaxControlToolkit
Frameworks
ASP.NET, Telerik
Platforms
Microsoft IIS (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical URLs
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Azure Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), Azure Application Insights
Marketing tools
Azure Application Insights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from provided raw output
  3. Strong presence of industry-specific content and events
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy implemented
  5. No visible security headers in provided data
  6. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature ASP.NET Web Forms platform using Telerik UI controls and jQuery, indicating a stable but somewhat legacy technology stack. It integrates modern analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Azure Application Insights for monitoring and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with a good design quality and clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of server-side rendering and rich UI components. There is no evidence of a third-party CMS; the site appears to use a custom or proprietary CMS solution. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack by adopting newer frameworks and improving front-end performance optimizations. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could be enhanced for scalability and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reinsurance.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reinsurance.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.