Skip to main content

Security report for reichl.cz

Richard Reichl · Retail · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Reichl.cz is a small family-owned Czech business specializing in the handcrafted production and sale of decorative candles, ceramic trays, and blacksmith products. The company emphasizes quality materials, such as health-safe paraffin, and traditional craftsmanship with a focus on long-lasting candles and appealing designs. Their market position is that of a niche local manufacturer with a direct-to-consumer e-commerce model. Technically, the website uses a moderate modern tech stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various gallery and carousel libraries, with a CMS named inPage. The site is mobile-optimized and includes standard SEO and accessibility features, though some improvements are possible. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks advanced HTTP security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust assessment, but the website content and business information are consistent and professional. Overall, the site is safe, compliant with GDPR, and suitable for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching reichl.cz

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, focusing on handcrafted decorative products. Their business model relies on direct sales via an integrated e-shop, targeting customers interested in artisanal home decor. The presence of VAT and registration numbers indicates formal business operations. The website content and structure support a professional image, though the lack of WHOIS data is a minor concern. The company appears to maintain a localized market presence with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Marketing efforts include Google Analytics and Tag Manager for performance tracking. The business benefits from clear contact information and compliance with privacy regulations, enhancing customer trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and a cookie consent banner with granular user controls, reflecting good privacy practices. Login forms include captcha for password recovery, reducing automated abuse risk. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contacts, which could improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional headers and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header to enforce HTTPS usage.
  3. Regularly update all third-party libraries and dependencies to latest secure versions.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Richard Reichl
VAT number
CZ6603261907
Registration number
43549004
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Richard Reichl
Description
Malá rodinná firma s dlouholetou tradicí z Moravy, působící v Krkonoších, vyrábějící ručně dekorativní svíčky z kvalitního zdravotně nezávadného parafínu s dlouhou dobou hoření a minimálním stékáním. Doplňkově nabízí ruční kovářské výrobky a keramické tácky.
Key services
ruční výroba dekorativních svíček, prodej keramických tácků, prodej kovářských výrobků
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4, Blueimp Gallery, Slick Carousel, Magic Grid
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • secure login form with captcha for password reset

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Toplist.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a small family business e-commerce site selling handcrafted candles and related products.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust assessment.
  3. Good privacy and cookie compliance with explicit consent mechanisms.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response info.
  5. Uses common web technologies and libraries with moderate performance.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected.
  7. Contact info and company registration details are clearly presented.
  8. No suspicious external domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the inPage CMS platform and uses a combination of jQuery, Bootstrap 3.4, Blueimp Gallery, Slick Carousel, and Magic Grid libraries. The site loads asynchronously Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics scripts for tracking. The design is responsive and mobile-friendly with a clear navigation structure. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses a cookie consent modal with granular controls, indicating attention to privacy compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business e-commerce site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with reichl.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review reichl.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.