Skip to main content

Security report for rehasportwelt.de

Rehasportwelt e. V. · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Rehasportwelt e. V. is a German non-profit association dedicated to providing information and services related to rehabilitationsport (rehabilitation sports) in Germany. The organization offers courses, billing, and marketing services to its target audience, which includes individuals and organizations interested in rehabilitationsport. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and incorporates Rank Math PRO for SEO optimization. Hosting is provided by rzone.de, as indicated by the nameservers. The site demonstrates good content quality and user experience with a professional design and clear navigation, optimized for mobile devices. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are critical for compliance and trust. Analytics are implemented via Koko Analytics with cookie-based tracking, indicating moderate user tracking. The security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing standard security headers and clear incident response contacts. Overall, the website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, and the domain appears legitimate though WHOIS data is minimal. Strategic recommendations include enhancing privacy compliance, adding contact and security policies, and improving security best practices to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rehasportwelt.de

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
55
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, focusing on rehabilitationsport in Germany. Its business model revolves around providing educational courses, billing services, and marketing support to its members or clients. The market position is niche, serving a specialized community interested in rehabilitation sports. The website content and services suggest a small-sized organization with consistent branding and good content relevance. There is no indication of parent companies or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed contact information and certifications limits the visibility of trust signals. The use of modern CMS and SEO tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No suspicious or partner domains were identified from the content.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs), but no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data. There are no visible security or incident response policies, nor contact channels for security issues. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. Analytics tracking is cookie-based, which requires proper consent mechanisms that are currently missing. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the content. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, clear privacy and cookie policies, and incident response contacts to improve its security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and publish contact channels for security issues to enhance trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rehasportwelt e. V.
Description
Die Rehasportwelt e. V. informiert zum Rehabilitationssport (Rehasport) in Deutschland und bietet: Kurse ✓ Abrechnung ✓ Marketing ✓ u.v.m.!
Key services
Information on rehabilitationssport, Courses, Billing services, Marketing services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, PHP, JavaScript
Frameworks
Rank Math PRO SEO
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Koko Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO SEO, Koko Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress site using Divi theme and Rank Math PRO SEO plugin.
  2. Content is in German and focused on rehabilitationsport in Germany.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found in the HTML content.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected.
  6. Analytics via Koko Analytics is used with cookie-based tracking.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but indicates standard hosting with no privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Divi theme, a popular and modern CMS platform. SEO is managed using Rank Math PRO, indicating attention to search engine optimization. Hosting is provided by rzone.de, a German hosting provider, consistent with the website's target country. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site uses custom fonts and JavaScript for enhanced user experience. However, there is room for improvement in security configurations and privacy compliance. No critical technical issues were detected, but the absence of security headers and privacy policies represents technical debt and compliance risk.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rehasportwelt.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rehasportwelt.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.