Skip to main content

Security report for regea.org

REGEA · Energy · Croatia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

REGEA is a Croatian-based institution focused on energy and climate protection projects across the European Union. The organization provides investment implementation, advisory services, and innovative solutions in the energy sector, emphasizing sustainable and climate-friendly initiatives. The website reflects a professional presence with clear information about their services and projects, targeting stakeholders in energy, infrastructure, and climate sectors. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, hosted on SiteGround, and employs modern web technologies ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the domain registration data is consistent with the organization's identity and history, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of regea.org. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regea.org

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

REGEA operates in the energy sector with a focus on EU-funded projects and climate protection. Their business model revolves around project execution, consultancy, and financial analysis for energy and infrastructure initiatives. The organization targets public and private stakeholders involved in energy transition and climate adaptation. Their market position is that of an established regional player with EU-wide activity, founded in 2007. The website content and structured data reinforce their credibility, though the absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers on the main site may limit immediate engagement. The use of multilingual support indicates a broader European audience. Strategic partnerships or subsidiaries are not explicitly listed.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption and domain transfer protection, which are fundamental security measures. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely communication in case of security events. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting privacy compliance to some extent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Security best practices could be improved by adding security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to facilitate security communication.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
REGEA
Description
REGEA is an institution focused on investment implementation, advisory, and development of innovative solutions in the energy and climate protection sector, active across the European Union.
Key services
Energy projects and solutions, Infrastructure development, Climate protection initiatives, Feasibility studies and financial analyses, EU project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, SiteGround Optimizer, FontAwesome
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clicky Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Clicky Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party service.
  4. No direct email addresses or phone numbers found in the main HTML content.
  5. Contact form available on the contact page.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of modern CMS and page builder (WordPress and Elementor).
  8. Domain is well-established and registered to the organization named on the site.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor page builder, supported by SiteGround hosting infrastructure. It uses standard web technologies including jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements. Performance is moderate with some optimization via SiteGround Optimizer. Mobile responsiveness is good, and SEO meta tags and structured data are properly implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is room for improvement in security configurations and privacy compliance. The technical stack is appropriate for the organization's needs but should be maintained actively to avoid technical debt and security risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 45/100High37 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regea.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regea.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.