Skip to main content

Security report for regaltenbury.co.uk

Regal Tenbury Trust · Hospitality · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Regal Tenbury Trust operates a community arts venue located in Tenbury Wells, UK, housed in a historic 1937 art deco building. The organization offers a variety of live events, cinema screenings, community theatre, choir activities, and creative arts education, targeting local residents and arts enthusiasts. The website is built on the Squarespace platform, integrating common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and provides clear navigation and contact information, including social media links and a physical address. However, the WHOIS lookup for the domain www.regaltenbury.co.uk failed due to domain registration rules, indicating the domain may be a subdomain or alias, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner but no dedicated privacy policy page. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small non-profit arts organization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching regaltenbury.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Regal Tenbury Trust positions itself as a local cultural hub providing diverse arts and entertainment services. Its business model focuses on community engagement through events, education, and venue hire. The organization leverages digital channels including social media and online event promotion to reach its audience. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and privacy policy suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The website's use of Squarespace indicates a preference for ease of management and cost-effectiveness. The presence of terms and conditions and cookie consent demonstrates some regulatory awareness. The organization appears to have a stable local presence with potential for growth in digital engagement and security maturity.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which help mitigate common web vulnerabilities like clickjacking, XSS, and MIME sniffing. No visible incident response or security policies are published, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but no apparent vulnerabilities. The WHOIS domain registration anomaly reduces trust and should be investigated further. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header configurations and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement essential security headers including HSTS, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Investigate and resolve the domain registration issue to ensure domain legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Develop and publish incident response and security policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly review third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Regal Tenbury Trust
Registration number
Company No 7954848
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Regal Tenbury Trust
Description
Home page for the Regal in Tenbury Wells. A mixed arts venue in a lovely 1937 art deco building.
Key services
Live events, Cinema screenings, Venue hire, Community theatre and choir, Creative arts education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Typekit Fonts, YUI JavaScript Library
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a community arts venue with a focus on live events and cinema.
  2. Uses Squarespace CMS with standard integrations for analytics and marketing.
  3. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent banner is implemented.
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable due to domain registration error; domain may be a subdomain or alias.
  5. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and physical address.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  8. No signs of adult or explicit content; content is family-friendly.
  9. Terms and conditions page is present.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Squarespace CMS platform, utilizing standard web technologies including JavaScript libraries (YUI), Typekit fonts, and integrations with Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, typical for a Squarespace-hosted site. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and events. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some security best practices in HTTP headers. The WHOIS failure suggests a potential technical or administrative issue with the domain registration that should be addressed to avoid trust concerns.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with regaltenbury.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review regaltenbury.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.