Skip to main content

Security report for redzet.eu

Media · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redzet.lv is a Latvian website offering a large collection of photographs with descriptions focused on nature, cities, animals, technology, and crafts. The platform provides free downloads and options for photo purchase, targeting a general audience interested in Latvian-themed imagery. The website is well-structured with clear navigation and consistent branding, supported by a basic but functional privacy and cookie policy. Technical infrastructure relies on jQuery and related JavaScript libraries, with Google Analytics integrated for user tracking. Security posture is moderate with no visible security headers and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website shows no suspicious indicators and maintains a legitimate appearance. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and suitable for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redzet.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche media content provider specializing in Latvian photography and related cultural content. Its business model appears to be a hybrid of free content distribution and paid photo acquisition. The target market includes individuals interested in Latvian nature, travel, and crafts. The site maintains a moderate market position with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely come from photo sales and possibly donations, as indicated by a donation link. The platform uses standard web technologies and basic marketing tools, with Google Analytics for visitor insights. Growth potential depends on expanding content and improving technical and security features.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic to moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by external Google Analytics script loaded over HTTPS), but no explicit security headers are detected in the HTML content. There is no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page, and no incident response contacts are provided. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating GDPR awareness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The lack of terms of service and incident response information represents compliance and operational gaps. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security headers, documented incident response, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to improve security posture.
  2. Add a terms of service page to clarify user rights and responsibilities.
  3. Create a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Provide incident response contact information to demonstrate preparedness and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Fotogrāfijas ar aprakstiem par dabu, ūdeni, pilsētām, dzīvniekiem, cilvēkiem, sportu, valstīm un tehniku. Fotogrāfiju iegāde un to lejuplāde par brīvu.
Key services
photograph descriptions, photo downloads, photo purchase
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.2.1, jQuery UI, jQuery Rotate, Lazy loading library, Parallax.js, jQuery Fancybox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • cookie consent banner
  • no visible sensitive data exposure

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content focused on Latvian photography.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; limits domain registration analysis.
  3. No terms of service page found.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and functional.
  5. Contact email info@redzet.lv is provided in header and footer.
  6. No phone numbers or physical addresses found.
  7. No security.txt or incident response contacts found.
  8. Uses Google Analytics for tracking with cookie consent banner.
  9. No visible security headers detected in HTML content; actual HTTP headers unknown.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected; content safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a traditional jQuery-based tech stack with plugins for UI components, lazy loading, parallax effects, and image galleries. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and SEO meta tags. However, no modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected, which may limit scalability and maintainability. Performance is moderate, with some optimization opportunities in script loading and caching. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better keyboard navigation support. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small content site but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redzet.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redzet.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.