Skip to main content

Security report for redstone.finance

RedStone · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RedStone is a technology company specializing in modular oracle infrastructure for the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector. Their website highlights key products such as Price Feeds, Proof of Reserve, and Atom, targeting DeFi developers and financial clients seeking reliable blockchain data solutions. The company positions itself as a next-generation provider in the DeFi oracle market, emphasizing innovation and ecosystem integration. Technically, the website is built using modern frameworks like Vue.js and Webflow, with integrations for analytics and security tools such as Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA. The site is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience, though it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and some best practices, but could be improved by adding security headers and formal incident response information. Overall, the domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in this industry, and the website content and structure support a legitimate and credible business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: nyo3o23pm3o2pnbwcbhvtywqtlhsmqifjfuiucfs5dbczx6xfrda.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redstone.finance

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RedStone operates in the competitive DeFi infrastructure market, offering oracle services critical for decentralized applications. Their business model revolves around providing reliable, modular data feeds and proof of reserve services, which are essential for trust and transparency in DeFi protocols. The website's references to staking RED tokens and partnerships with platforms like EigenLayer suggest active ecosystem engagement and token utility. The company targets developers and institutional clients, indicating a B2B focus. While the website lacks detailed business registration or contact information, the professional presentation and product clarity indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a strong technology orientation. Growth potential is supported by the expanding DeFi market and the increasing demand for secure oracle solutions.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good baseline security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms from abuse. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are also missing, which may impact compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents, including an incident response or abuse email address.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RedStone
Description
Modular oracle infrastructure powering next-gen DeFi. Explore RedStone’s products, ecosystem, and vision for the future of finance.
Key services
Price Feeds, Proof of Reserve, Atom
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, Infinite Scroll, Spline Viewer
Frameworks
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy protected, limiting domain ownership insights.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided HTML.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools.
  6. Content is focused on DeFi oracle infrastructure products and services.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No certifications or security policies explicitly mentioned.
  9. Website design and navigation are professional and user-friendly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS with Vue.js for frontend interactivity, integrating third-party services like Google Tag Manager for analytics and reCAPTCHA for bot protection. The use of modern JavaScript libraries and infinite scroll indicates a focus on user experience and dynamic content loading. Hosting appears to be managed by Webflow, which provides reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with room for optimization, especially in accessibility and SEO. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured, but lacks some advanced technical SEO and security features. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence suitable for a medium-sized tech company in the DeFi space.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redstone.finance. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redstone.finance.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.