Skip to main content

Security report for redinter.pe

Redinter · Energy · Peru

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Redinter is a medium-sized energy sector company operating in Peru, specializing in the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of high voltage electrical transmission infrastructure. It is part of the Redeia group, a recognized leader in the energy transmission industry. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with content primarily in Spanish, targeting energy sector clients and stakeholders in Peru. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS, uses modern web technologies, and is hosted behind Imperva Incapsula CDN/WAF, ensuring good performance and security. The SSL configuration is robust with OCSP stapling and no known vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is basic but includes a cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of content quality, technical implementation, and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching redinter.pe

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
87
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Redinter holds a strong market position in Peru's electrical transmission sector, managing extensive transmission circuits through multiple concessions. Its affiliation with Redeia enhances its credibility and operational capacity. The business model focuses on concession-based infrastructure management, serving clients in various Peruvian regions. The website reflects a corporate approach with clear navigation and multilingual support. Partnerships and subsidiaries are well represented through linked domains. The company emphasizes sustainability and social responsibility projects, indicating a strategic focus on corporate social responsibility. Marketing and analytics tools are used moderately, with Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for tracking and consent management.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate covering multiple related domains. Security headers such as HSTS are present but could be enhanced by including subdomains and preload directives. Cookies are set with Secure and HttpOnly flags, and OCSP stapling is enabled and successful. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response information are absent, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. The presence of Imperva Incapsula CDN/WAF provides additional protection against common web threats. Overall, the security posture is good but can be strengthened by adopting additional security headers and publishing formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HSTS includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement across all subdomains.
  2. Publish explicit security policy and incident response pages to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing GDPR adherence and data retention policies.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS with a modern front-end including Google Fonts and JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. Hosting is provided through Imperva Incapsula CDN/WAF, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, and SEO best practices such as meta tags and canonical links are implemented. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is mature and well-maintained, with opportunities for modernization in security headers and privacy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with redinter.pe. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review redinter.pe.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.