Skip to main content

Security report for recordcollectormag.com

Media · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Record Collector Magazine is a niche UK-based media publication specializing in rare and collectible music records. Established since 2000, it holds a strong market position as the longest-running monthly music magazine in its segment, targeting music collectors and enthusiasts. The website offers news, reviews, and interviews related to collectible records, serving a specialized audience with relevant content. Technically, the site is built on WordPress, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, and utilizes modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Adobe Launch for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices but lacks some advanced accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and use of reCAPTCHA, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies and no consent mechanisms. Business credibility is supported by domain age and consistent WHOIS data, but contact information is not clearly presented on the homepage content analyzed. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching recordcollectormag.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention recordcollectormag.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
26
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
15%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for recordcollectormag.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates as a specialized media publisher in the music collectibles niche, leveraging a subscription and advertising-based business model. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence and focused content on rare records, appealing to a dedicated collector audience. Revenue streams likely include magazine subscriptions, advertising, and possibly affiliate sales. The target customer segment is music collectors and enthusiasts primarily in the UK. The company shows moderate digital maturity with integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools, but lacks transparency in privacy and security policies. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and reCAPTCHA is used to protect forms, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which limits transparency and preparedness. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve browser security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and monitor third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and performance impact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Record Collector, UK’s longest-running music monthly, features Q&A’s on rare and obscure records, largest news and reviews section, collectors’ interviews & much more.
Key services
music magazine publication, news and reviews on rare records, collectors’ interviews
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Adobe Launch, reCAPTCHA
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for tracking

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Adobe Launch
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established music magazine focused on rare and collectible records.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage content provided.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Domain is well aged and consistent with business claims.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure, leveraging Google Fonts and multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Adobe Launch. The site is mobile-optimized and uses modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements possible by optimizing third-party script loading and caching strategies. Accessibility is basic and could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. SEO is good with proper meta tags and canonical URLs. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with recordcollectormag.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review recordcollectormag.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.