Skip to main content

Security report for recisio.com

Recisio · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Recisio is a medium-sized company specializing in designing, creating, and maintaining large-scale digital applications and websites for the music industry, targeting performers, teachers, musicians, and music lovers. Their mission is to spread happiness through music, serving approximately one million users monthly across 10 languages. The company operates under the KaraFun Group umbrella, indicating a solid market position with established partnerships and affiliate programs. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as JavaScript and CountUp.js, with good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which impacts compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, reducing domain legitimacy and transparency. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching recisio.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Recisio holds a competitive position in the digital music services sector, offering metadata management, production, distribution, and reporting services. Their business model includes B2B partnerships via APIs and affiliate programs, enabling revenue generation through catalog integration. The company targets a niche audience of music professionals and enthusiasts, leveraging a partnership ecosystem including the KaraFun Group. Growth indicators include a large multilingual user base and multiple partner logos displayed. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of contact details may hinder trust and customer engagement. Strategic partnerships and affiliate programs suggest a scalable and collaborative business approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The absence of WHOIS data further reduces trustworthiness and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, header implementation, and domain registration clarity to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish explicit contact information including security and incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  4. Ensure WHOIS domain registration data is complete and publicly accessible to enhance domain legitimacy.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet WCAG standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Recisio
Description
Recisio designs, creates, and maintains large-scale apps and websites for performers, teachers, musicians, and music lovers. Their mission is to spread happiness through music. They serve about 1 million users monthly in 10 languages.
Key services
Metadata, Production, Distribution, Reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CountUp.js, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or navigation.
  4. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but no explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  5. The site is part of a group with related domains and affiliate programs.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  7. Content is professional, focused on music digital services and partnerships.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with JavaScript and external font services from Google Fonts. It includes CountUp.js for animated counters, indicating interactive UI elements. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags. No CMS or backend technologies were detected from the provided data. Hosting provider details are not available. Performance appears moderate with no explicit speed metrics. There is room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The site structure and navigation are clear and professional, supporting a positive user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with recisio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review recisio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.