Skip to main content

Security report for recenzijefilmova.com

Recenzije Filmova i Serija · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Recenzije Filmova i Serija is a small media website focused on providing film and series reviews, news, trailers, and recommendations primarily targeting movie and series enthusiasts. The site is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies such as PHP, JavaScript, and Google Fonts. The digital maturity is moderate with good SEO practices and mobile optimization, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but requires improvements in security and compliance to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching recenzijefilmova.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the media sector, focusing on entertainment content related to films and TV series. It targets a niche audience of movie enthusiasts and provides subjective reviews and recommendations. The business model appears to be content publishing without evident monetization or advertising partnerships. The site is relatively new, founded around 2024, with no parent company or subsidiaries identified. The lack of contact information and privacy policies limits business credibility. The site owner is identified as Denis Nekic, who is the founder and content creator. The platform's competitive advantage lies in localized content and personalized reviews but lacks broader market positioning or partnerships.

Security posture

The security maturity level is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Incident response and security policies are not found, which may impact readiness for security incidents. The site should implement security best practices and compliance measures to improve its security posture and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling practices.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
  5. Consider implementing an incident response plan and publicly disclose security policies to demonstrate commitment to security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Recenzije Filmova i Serija
Description
Recenzije Filmova i Serija, Filmske Recenzije, Najbolji Novi Filmovi Serije, Zanimljivosti, Glumci, Vijesti, Gledanje Trailera, Preporuke.
Key services
film reviews, series reviews, news, trailers, recommendations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, Google Fonts, Yoast SEO
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WHOIS registration data available
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  5. Site uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Fonts
  6. No security headers detected in provided data
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected
  8. Content is focused on film and series reviews in English
  9. Site owner identified as Denis Nekic via structured data
  10. No signs of adult or NSFW content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO plugin and uses Google Fonts for typography. The site is mobile optimized and has a good SEO foundation with proper meta tags and structured data including JSON-LD for author and breadcrumb information. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from optimization. Accessibility is basic with room for improvement. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks security headers and advanced security configurations, which are technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small content site but requires enhancements for security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with recenzijefilmova.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review recenzijefilmova.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.