Skip to main content

Security report for realto.io

re.alto-energy SRL · Energy · Belgium

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Realto.io is a website associated with re.alto-energy SRL, a Belgian company operating in the energy sector since 2019. The website appears to serve as a business platform likely targeting professionals and businesses within the energy industry. The digital infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with performance optimization via WPRocket and cookie consent management through Cookiebot, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and GDPR awareness. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are important for compliance and user trust. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing advanced security headers and DNSSEC, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. Overall, the website is functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and security measures to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realto.io

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy sector with a small business size and a relatively recent founding date of 2019. The domain registration details align well with the company information, supporting legitimacy. The business model appears to be B2B focused, though specific services are not detailed in the provided content. The website does not showcase extensive marketing or partnership ecosystems, and no social media presence was detected in the analyzed content. The use of Cookiebot suggests some attention to regulatory compliance, but the absence of detailed policies and contact information limits the business credibility. Growth indicators and competitive positioning are not discernible from the available data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are best practices for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. The absence of contact information for security matters further reduces the security maturity level. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is basic and would benefit from implementing additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts to facilitate communication and transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate potential risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
re.alto-energy SRL
Description
Realto.io is associated with re.alto-energy SRL, a company likely operating in the energy sector. The website appears to be a business platform related to energy services or products.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot, WPRocket
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with WPRocket optimization plugin
  2. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management indicating GDPR awareness
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. No social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  7. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and hosting provider
  8. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging WPRocket for performance optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Hosting is provided by Combell, a reputable provider. The site shows moderate performance and good mobile optimization but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. The HTML content is valid but minimal in metadata and structured data, limiting search engine optimization and rich snippet opportunities. The absence of social media integration and detailed business information suggests technical and content development opportunities to enhance digital presence and user engagement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realto.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realto.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.