Skip to main content

Security report for realness.institute

Realness Institute · Media · South Africa

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Realness Institute is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting independent Pan-African storytellers in cinema and television. The organization offers programs such as the AuthenticA Series Lab, Creative Producer Indaba, and African Screenwriters Residency to nurture African voices in film and TV. The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies and providing a professional, well-structured user experience. Social media integration and a donation mechanism via PayPal support community engagement and funding. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, though improvements such as HSTS and enhanced security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website presents a credible and trustworthy digital presence for a cultural non-profit entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching realness.institute

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention realness.institute, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for realness.institute right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Realness Institute occupies a niche position in the African media development sector, focusing on independent filmmakers and screenwriters. Its business model revolves around programmatic support and community building rather than commercial sales. The organization targets creatives and industry professionals interested in African storytelling. The website's content and structure reflect a focused mission with clear program offerings and news updates. Partnerships and payment processing are handled via external trusted platforms like PayPal. The absence of direct company contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels via forms and social media. The organization demonstrates consistent branding and a growing digital footprint.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of HSTS and advanced security headers like CSP reduces protection against certain attack vectors. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a security policy, incident response contact, or vulnerability disclosure page indicates room for maturity in security governance. Forms appear standard without visible security weaknesses. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing recommended best practices to enhance trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) header to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement a Content Security Policy (CSP) to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Realness Institute
Description
Supports independent Pan-African storytellers in cinema and television, nurturing development of African voices in film and TV.
Key services
AuthenticA Series Lab, Creative Producer Indaba, Realness African Screenwriters Residency, Past partnerships and industry news
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Typekit fonts, Google Fonts, Plyr video player
Platforms
Squarespace CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Squarespace marketing automations, Squarespace campaigns
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on supporting African independent filmmakers and screenwriters.
  3. Uses Squarespace CMS with standard integrations and no suspicious scripts.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form and social media.
  5. Privacy policy present but cookie consent mechanism missing.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
  8. SSL enabled but HSTS not configured.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  10. Donation link via PayPal present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, utilizing its built-in CMS and infrastructure. It uses Typekit and Google Fonts for typography and Plyr for video playback. The site loads multiple compressed JavaScript bundles from Squarespace's CDN, indicating a modern and optimized delivery approach. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by canonical tags and Open Graph metadata, though meta descriptions are minimal. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were observed. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility and SEO further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with realness.institute. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review realness.institute.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.