Dark web exposure
Add-onLeaked records that mention rdrn.app, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for rdrn.app right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Tobit.Labs · Hospitality · Germany
Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.
The website rdrn.app presents a digital boat rental service located at Schlossgräfte in Ahaus, Germany. It offers a modern, self-service platform allowing users to book and pay for rowing boats via smartphone, reviving a traditional leisure activity with digital convenience. The business operates on the chayns platform, leveraging its ecosystem for app integration and site management. The target audience includes local visitors and tourists interested in unique outdoor experiences. The business model is focused on direct digital bookings with a simple fee and deposit system, positioning itself as a niche local service with a strong emphasis on user autonomy and ease of use. Technically, the site is built using React and chayns frameworks, hosted on Tobit.cloud infrastructure. It employs modern web technologies such as JSON-LD for structured data, Swiper.js for image galleries, and CSS modules for styling. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social sharing and search visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data in its HTML content. However, it lacks visible security headers and does not provide a cookie consent mechanism or a detailed privacy policy, which are important for GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, indicating room for improvement in security transparency and user trust. No suspicious or malicious elements were detected, and the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, rdrn.app is a well-structured, user-friendly site serving a specific local market with a digital-first approach. To enhance its security posture and compliance, the business should implement cookie consent, publish comprehensive privacy and security policies, and add security headers. These steps will improve user trust and regulatory adherence while maintaining the site's positive user experience.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
SPF helps prevent email spoofing
What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention rdrn.app, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for rdrn.app right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with rdrn.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rdrn.app.