Skip to main content

Security report for rccelta.es

RC Celta · Media · Spain

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RC Celta's official website serves as the primary digital platform for the professional football club, providing fans with news, ticket purchasing options, and club-related services. The site targets supporters and stakeholders interested in the club's activities and offerings. The business model centers on fan engagement and service provision through digital channels, positioning RC Celta as a recognized entity in the sports media sector within Spain. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and WPBakery Page Builder to enhance content management and SEO performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot demonstrates a mature approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and exhibits good design and navigation clarity, supporting a positive user experience. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and includes several security headers, alongside the use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate bot activity. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR requirements, reflecting a commitment to privacy. However, the absence of explicit terms of service, security policy, and incident response contact information represents gaps in the security posture that could be addressed to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and contact availability. The domain registration aligns with the club's identity, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive legal and security policies, enhancing accessibility, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rccelta.es

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rccelta.es, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
321
Employees
1
Customers
313
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
21%

Latest record dated 2025-08-13 · 13 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rccelta.es.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –correo.rccelta.es2025-08-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RC Celta operates as a professional football club with a strong digital presence through its official website. The club leverages its online platform to engage fans, provide timely news, and facilitate ticket sales, which are key revenue streams. The website's integration with major advertising and analytics platforms indicates an active marketing strategy aimed at maximizing fan reach and monetization opportunities. The absence of direct contact information suggests a focus on digital self-service, typical for sports organizations. The club's market position is solid within the Spanish football ecosystem, supported by consistent branding and content quality. Partnerships with major platforms like Google, Facebook, and TikTok reflect a broad digital ecosystem engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and bot mitigation via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent is managed through Cookiebot, ensuring GDPR compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency and preparedness perception. The site would benefit from implementing a security.txt file and publishing a dedicated security policy page. Accessibility features are basic, and further enhancements could improve compliance with accessibility standards. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be strengthened with improved documentation and user communication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit terms of service and privacy policy pages to enhance legal transparency.
  2. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  3. Implement a comprehensive Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG guidelines and improve user experience.
  5. Establish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RC Celta
Description
Web oficial del RC Celta. Descubre las últimas novedades del RC Celta, servicios Mais Celta, compra de entradas y más información sobre el club.
Key services
News updates, Mais Celta services, Ticket sales, Club information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4, Yoast SEO plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, TikTok Pixel, Twitter Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is the official site of RC Celta football club
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and page building
  3. Implements cookie consent with Cookiebot and complies with GDPR
  4. Includes multiple third-party integrations for analytics and advertising
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues
  6. Lacks explicit terms of service and security policy pages
  7. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the analyzed content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a well-known CMS platform (WordPress) with standard plugins for SEO and page building, indicating a mature and maintainable technical infrastructure. The use of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot reflects modern analytics and privacy management practices. Performance is moderate, with preloading of fonts and asynchronous loading of scripts to optimize user experience. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, there is room for improvement in security headers and accessibility compliance. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with opportunities for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rccelta.es. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rccelta.es.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.