Skip to main content

Security report for rbro.cz

Raiffeisen Broker, s.r.o. · Finance · Czech Republic

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raiffeisen Broker, s.r.o. operates as an insurance brokerage firm specializing in non-life insurance products, including vehicle insurance, property insurance, and other insurance services. The company is positioned as a small but professional entity within the Czech Republic's financial sector, leveraging its association with the Raiffeisen group to enhance market credibility. The website reflects a clear business focus with well-structured content and accessible contact information. Technically, the website is built on the Kentico CMS platform and utilizes modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and RequireJS. Google Tag Manager is employed for analytics and marketing tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. Performance is moderate, with no significant technical issues detected. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes secure form handling with file upload capabilities. However, explicit security headers are not detected, and no public security or incident response policies are available. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy indicate compliance with GDPR requirements. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, impacting the overall trustworthiness assessment. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for Raiffeisen Broker, but improvements in transparency regarding domain registration and enhanced security headers would strengthen its security posture and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rbro.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rbro.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for rbro.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raiffeisen Broker operates in the insurance brokerage sector, targeting individuals and businesses seeking non-life insurance products in the Czech Republic. The company's competitive advantage lies in its affiliation with the well-known Raiffeisen financial group, which likely supports client trust and brand recognition. The business model focuses on providing comprehensive insurance solutions, including auto, property, and other insurance types. The website content and linked partner domains suggest a tightly integrated partnership ecosystem within the Raiffeisen group. Growth indicators are not explicitly visible, but the professional web presence and clear service offerings indicate a stable market position. Revenue streams are presumably commission-based from insurance product sales. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced digital transparency and security policy disclosures to align with industry best practices.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. The presence of secure forms with file upload functionality indicates attention to secure data handling. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. GDPR compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not publicly documented, which is a potential area for improvement. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raiffeisen Broker, s.r.o.
Description
Poskytujeme širokou škálu pojistných produktů z oblasti neživotního pojištění.
Key services
Autopojištění, Pojištění majetku, Ostatní pojištění
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, RequireJS, Bootstrap Tooltip, Bootstrap Modal, Kentico CMS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Kentico CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with file upload
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to insurance brokerage.
  3. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented properly.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in HTML source.
  6. Use of Kentico CMS and Bootstrap framework.
  7. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented and consistent.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. No incident response or security policy information publicly available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Kentico CMS, Bootstrap framework, and RequireJS for modular JavaScript loading. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking, indicating a mature approach to data-driven marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and preloaded fonts for performance. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence suitable for the company's business needs.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rbro.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rbro.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.