Skip to main content

Security report for ravflgv.nl

RAV Flevoland RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek · Healthcare · Netherlands

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RAV Flevoland RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek operates as a regional ambulance service provider in the Netherlands, focusing on emergency medical care and patient transport within the Flevoland and Gooi en Vechtstreek regions. The website serves as an information portal for residents and healthcare professionals, offering details about ambulance services, locations, news, and contact options. The organization positions itself as a key regional healthcare service with a public service business model. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and integrates Google services including Analytics, Tag Manager, and reCAPTCHA for security and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be enhanced. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare for CDN and performance improvements. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms, but lacks several important security headers that could improve defense against common web attacks. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy present, but no explicit cookie consent mechanism was found, which is a gap for GDPR compliance. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-maintained, with a solid business credibility score. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing explicit security and incident response policies to strengthen compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ravflgv.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare and transportation sectors, providing essential ambulance and emergency medical services regionally. Its business model is public service-oriented, targeting residents and healthcare providers in specific Dutch regions. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized entity with a focus on transparency and community engagement through news updates and contact forms. Partnerships with regional health organizations such as GGD Flevoland and RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek are evident, supporting a collaborative ecosystem. The site’s content quality and branding consistency support a strong market position as a trusted regional healthcare provider.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate automated abuse. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces its defense-in-depth capabilities. No direct incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. GDPR compliance is partially met with a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating a generally secure environment but with room for improvement in security best practices and compliance completeness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet WCAG standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RAV Flevoland RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RAV Flevoland RAV Gooi en Vechtstreek
Description
Regional ambulance services providing emergency medical care and ambulance transport in the Flevoland and Gooi en Vechtstreek regions of the Netherlands.
Key services
Ambulancezorg (ambulance care), Meldkamer (dispatch center), Medium Complexe Ambulance, Patient transport, Scientific research
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, jQuery, Slick Slider, Google Maps API
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to regional ambulance services.
  3. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  4. Security headers could be improved for enhanced protection.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  6. Contact information is available primarily via contact forms and physical addresses; no direct company emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled found.
  7. Social media presence includes Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a custom theme 'ambulancezorg-flevoland' and integrates several modern web technologies including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google and YouTube, and uses Slick Slider for interactive content. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare CDN for performance and security. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation clarity and SEO metadata. Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ravflgv.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravflgv.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.