Skip to main content

Security report for ravenou.ee

Raven OÜ · Energy · Estonia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raven OÜ is a small Estonian company specializing in water utility services, including water supply, water-saving advice, and infrastructure development. The company targets local residents and businesses in the Harju maakond region, providing essential water-related services and customer support. The website is professionally designed using Joomla CMS and offers clear navigation and relevant content focused on water conservation and service notifications. Technically, the website employs a standard Joomla stack with modern JavaScript and CSS assets. It is hosted by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with the domain registration data. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features could be improved. No advanced analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but also a lack of marketing sophistication. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and includes CSRF tokens in scripts, which is positive. However, it lacks important security headers and does not publish privacy, cookie, or security policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, representing a compliance and security gap. Overall, the website is legitimate and trustworthy based on domain age and registration consistency. The main risks relate to privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the company's digital maturity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ravenou.ee

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raven OÜ operates as a local water utility provider in Estonia, focusing on water supply and conservation services. Its market position is regional with a stable presence since 2010. The business model revolves around providing essential water services and customer engagement through information dissemination and infrastructure development. The company benefits from clear contact channels and a professional web presence but lacks advanced digital marketing or analytics capabilities. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital services and improving compliance frameworks. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident, indicating a focused, standalone operation.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and CSRF protections are in place, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates GDPR compliance gaps. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, which is positive. Overall, the security maturity is basic and would benefit from formalized policies, enhanced headers, and published incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency.
  4. Add incident response contact information, such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimizations to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Raven OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raven OÜ
Description
Raven OÜ is a company focused on water services including water supply, water-saving recommendations, and related infrastructure developments. They provide information on water conservation, service interruptions, and customer joining procedures.
Key services
Water supply service, Water-saving advice, Service interruption notifications, Network development, Purgimisteenus (likely related to septic or waste services)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, FontAwesome, JavaScript ES5/ES6, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  5. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  6. Website uses Joomla CMS with standard scripts and styles.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  9. Website content is focused on water services and conservation advice.
  10. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with standard CSS and JavaScript assets, including FontAwesome icons. It uses modern script loading techniques (defer, module/nomodule) and includes CSRF tokens for form security. Hosting is provided by Elkdata OÜ, consistent with domain registration. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. The site is mobile-optimized but could improve accessibility compliance. SEO is basic with meta viewport and title tags but lacks advanced structured data beyond minimal schema.org BlogPosting. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal data collection.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ravenou.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ravenou.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.