Skip to main content

Security report for raumaster.fi

Raumaster Oy · Energy · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raumaster Oy is a Finnish company founded in 1984 specializing in advanced material handling systems primarily for the energy, pulp, and paper industries. The company positions itself as a global leader in its sector, offering a range of products and services including fuel yards, pneumatic conveying, wood handling, and related services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content targeted at industrial B2B customers. The presence of a subsidiary, Raumaster Paper, indicates business diversification within related industrial sectors. Technically, the website uses modern analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Snoobi, hosted on the Flockler platform, and is optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices. However, there is room for improvement in accessibility and explicit privacy compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raumaster.fi

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention raumaster.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
5
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
5
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for raumaster.fi.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raumaster Oy operates in a niche industrial market with a strong focus on material handling solutions for energy and manufacturing sectors. Its long-standing history and global market position provide competitive advantages. The business model is B2B, targeting large industrial clients requiring specialized equipment and services. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides clear contact information, enhancing customer engagement. The website content and structure support lead generation and brand trust but lack explicit privacy and security policy disclosures, which could impact compliance and customer confidence. The subsidiary domain Raumaster Paper suggests strategic expansion or specialization within the paper industry segment.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses reputable analytics services. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Include data protection officer contact details if applicable to meet regulatory requirements.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Raumaster Oy
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raumaster Oy
Description
Raumaster Oy, founded in 1984, is a renowned supplier of advanced material handling systems and equipment. Today our company is regarded as a global leader in its line of business.
Key services
Fuel yards, Fuel, Ash and Material Handling, Pneumatic Conveying, Wood handling, Service, Raumaster Paper
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Snoobi Analytics, Flockler platform
Platforms
Flockler CMS/platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snoobi Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snoobi Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact information is clear but no email addresses explicitly provided
  4. Social media presence is active on major platforms
  5. No visible security policy or incident response info
  6. Uses modern analytics and tracking tools without explicit consent mechanisms
  7. No forms collecting personal data detected on main page
  8. No security headers detected in provided data, potential improvement area
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Flockler platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses CDN-hosted assets for performance. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility basics. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and explicit ARIA roles or landmarks. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing images and scripts. The technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization in security headers and privacy compliance tooling.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raumaster.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raumaster.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.