Skip to main content

Security report for rat.xxx

Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.rat.xxx is an adult entertainment platform offering free streaming and downloading of pornographic videos. It features a large catalog of categorized content targeting adult viewers seeking free HD sex videos. The business model appears to be ad-supported, leveraging multiple third-party ad networks and analytics services. The site is moderately sized with a professional design and good navigation, optimized for mobile devices. Technically, it uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Yandex Metrika for tracking user behavior. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring secure connections. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, and does not provide contact information or incident response channels, which are critical for compliance and trust. The WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or lack of transparency in domain registration, which lowers trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and content-rich but has significant gaps in privacy compliance and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rat.xxx

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform operates in the adult media sector, competing by offering free access to a vast collection of porn videos. Its competitive advantage lies in the breadth of content and integration with popular adult content networks. Revenue is likely generated through advertising, as evidenced by the presence of ExoClick and extensive tracking scripts. The target audience is adult consumers seeking free pornographic content. The site maintains partnerships with several related adult sites, expanding its network reach. Growth indicators include frequent new video uploads and active user engagement features like search and categorization. However, the lack of transparent business information and contact details may hinder trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data in the HTML. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and potential privacy risks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies detected. Overall, while basic security practices are in place, significant improvements are needed to enhance security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response process including abuse and security contacts.
  4. Regularly audit and minimize third-party scripts to reduce privacy risks and potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve transparency by publishing WHOIS data or using verified domain registration to enhance trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The latest free porn movies and sex videos. The ultimate xxx collection! Download or stream HD porn for free!
Key services
Free porn video streaming, Video downloads, Categorized adult content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, jQuery UI (autocomplete), Fancybox, Custom CSS, HTML5, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
ExoClick
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content streaming and download platform with a large video catalog
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers provided
  5. Uses multiple third-party analytics and ad networks
  6. HTTPS is enabled and enforced
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected
  8. Content is accessible and not blocked
  9. Site uses modern tracking and marketing technologies
  10. No security headers detected in provided data
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Yandex Metrika for analytics and tracking. It employs lazy loading and responsive images for performance optimization. The HTML and CSS appear valid and well-structured, supporting good SEO and accessibility basics. The site is mobile optimized with a responsive design and clear navigation menus. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible from the data. Performance is moderate, with preloading of key CSS and images. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and improved security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rat.xxx. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rat.xxx.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.