Skip to main content

Security report for ramp.com

Ramp · Finance · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ramp is a well-established financial technology company specializing in spend management solutions, including corporate cards, bill payments, accounting automation, and accounts payable services. The company targets finance teams and corporate businesses, positioning itself as a comprehensive platform to streamline financial operations and improve efficiency. With over 40,000 finance teams served and thousands of positive reviews, Ramp holds a strong market position in the finance and technology sectors. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted likely on Vercel with Cloudflare DNS and CDN services. The site demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and SEO practices. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS with clientTransferProhibited domain status, indicating good domain security practices. However, explicit security headers and public security policies are not evident in the provided content. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and technically sound, but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts privacy compliance scoring. Strategic improvements in publishing comprehensive privacy, cookie, and security policies would strengthen the site's compliance and user trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ramp.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ramp.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ramp operates in the finance and technology sectors, offering a SaaS spend management platform that integrates corporate cards, expense management, and accounts payable automation. Its business model focuses on subscription-based services targeting medium to large enterprises and finance teams. The company has a significant customer base, indicating strong market acceptance and growth potential. Ramp leverages partnerships with major payment networks and integrates with accounting and travel platforms, enhancing its ecosystem. The use of advanced marketing and analytics tools reflects a data-driven approach to customer acquisition and retention. The domain's long history and consistent registration details support the company's credibility and stability in the market.

Security posture

Ramp's security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, Cloudflare DNS, and domain transfer protection. The use of Sentry for error monitoring indicates proactive operational security. However, the absence of explicit security headers and public security policies, including incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, represents gaps in transparency and potential compliance risks. The extensive use of third-party marketing and tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy considerations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Enhancing security documentation and implementing DNSSEC would further strengthen the security framework.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and publicly disclose a security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or publish a security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ramp
Description
Make expense management easy with Ramp's spend management platform. Combine global corporate cards, travel, expenses and accounts payable to automate finance operations and improve efficiency.
Key services
Corporate cards, Spend management platform, Bill payments, Accounting automation, Travel and expense management, Accounts payable solutions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Cloudflare, Sentry, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, AdRoll, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Twitter Ads
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Vercel (likely hosting due to Sentry environment), Cloudflare DNS and CDN
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (implied via GTM), Hotjar, Qualified
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
AdRoll, Twitter Ads, Bing Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Hotjar, AdRoll, Twitter Pixel, Bing Pixel
Marketing tools
Qualified, Hotjar, Sentry
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional and modern design with clear business focus on finance and spend management.
  3. Extensive use of third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found in the provided content snippet.
  5. WHOIS data shows a very old domain with Cloudflare as registrar and DNS provider.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Strong branding and trust signals from customer counts and reviews.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React and Next.js stack, optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. Hosting and DNS are managed by reputable providers (Vercel and Cloudflare). The site integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom-built solution. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. Potential technical risks include reliance on numerous third-party scripts which may impact privacy and security. The absence of DNSSEC and some security headers are areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low22 findingsView report
  2. 64/100Medium15 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ramp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ramp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.