Skip to main content

Security report for ralfing.ch

Ralf Eggenberger · Healthcare · Switzerland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ralf Eggenberger operates a specialized complementary therapy practice focusing on Strukturelle Integration (Rolfing) in Zürich and Baden, Switzerland. The business targets individuals seeking holistic bodywork to improve physical and psychological well-being through manual therapy techniques. The website presents a professional image with clear service descriptions, contact information, and social media presence, positioning the practice as a trusted local provider in the healthcare sector. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Analytics 4 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. A comprehensive cookie consent mechanism ensures GDPR compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers and incident response information are absent. Overall, the site is well-structured, user-friendly, and trustworthy, supporting the business's credibility and client engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ralfing.ch

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates a small-scale, service-based complementary therapy model with a focus on Rolfing and structural integration techniques. It leverages local market positioning in Zürich and Baden, supported by a professional online presence and active social media channels. Revenue streams likely derive from therapy sessions booked via the website or direct contact. The company benefits from EMR recognition, enhancing trust and legitimacy. The website's integration with booking widgets and analytics tools indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data. Growth potential lies in expanding digital marketing and enhancing client engagement through improved online services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, no exposed sensitive data, and a robust cookie consent framework aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is consent-based, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is adequate for a small healthcare service provider but could be improved with additional hardening and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance site security.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a terms of service page to complete legal documentation and clarify user agreements.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to detect and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ralf Eggenberger
Description
Praxis offering Strukturelle Integration (Rolfing) therapy in Zürich and Baden focused on holistic bodywork to improve body structure, alignment, and balance through manual techniques, movement, breathing, and energy work.
Key services
Strukturelle Integration (Rolfing), Bodywork therapy, Movement and perception training
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics 4, N3t Cookie Consent Manager, Camera slideshow plugin
Frameworks
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics 4
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics 4
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented with granular categories.
  3. No terms of service page found, which is a minor gap.
  4. Contact information is clear and professional with multiple channels.
  5. Use of modern CMS (Joomla) and standard analytics tools.
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  7. Social media presence is active and linked.
  8. Content is relevant, professional, and targeted to complementary therapy clients.
  9. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and custom JavaScript for UI components like slideshows and cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics 4 are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes, with consent-based activation. The site uses responsive design techniques and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. The cookie consent manager is well configured with granular categories and user controls. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies are evident, but security headers are missing which is a technical gap. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant web presence suitable for a small healthcare business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ralfing.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ralfing.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.