Skip to main content

Security report for rajapack.no

RAJAPACK · Retail · Norway

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RAJAPACK is a leading European packaging supplier operating a professional e-commerce platform targeting business customers primarily in Norway and across Europe. The company offers a wide range of packaging products including boxes, envelopes, tapes, and protective materials with a focus on fast delivery and extensive product availability. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern search and analytics technologies integrated, including Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. Security measures such as HTTPS and CAPTCHA on login forms are implemented, though additional security headers and published security policies could enhance the security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear cookie and privacy policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration trust verification, but the website content and business information strongly indicate a legitimate and established business. Overall, the site is professionally designed, user-friendly, and compliant with relevant privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rajapack.no

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention rajapack.no, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
61
Employees
0
Customers
61
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for rajapack.no.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

RAJAPACK holds a strong market position as the number one packaging supplier in Europe, focusing on B2B e-commerce retail. Their business model revolves around providing a comprehensive product catalog with rapid delivery services to businesses. The company targets industries requiring packaging solutions, including logistics, retail, and manufacturing sectors. The website's multilingual and multi-regional presence through partner domains indicates a broad geographic reach. Integration with marketing and analytics tools suggests active customer engagement and data-driven decision-making. Trust indicators such as customer ratings and clear contact information support credibility. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and content quality across its digital assets.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs CAPTCHA on critical forms, indicating a baseline security awareness. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security represents an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness communication. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies regularly to ensure ongoing GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
RAJAPACK
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
RAJAPACK
Description
Nr. 1 på emballasje i Europa. RAJAPACK tilbyr et bredt sortiment av emballasjeprodukter med rask levering og 3000 produkter på lager.
Key services
Packaging products sales, Fast delivery, Custom packaging solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, ThankYou.io, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Frameworks
INTERSHOP e-commerce platform
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • CAPTCHA on login and password reset forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, ThankYou.io
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty
Tracking pixels
ThankYou.io
Marketing tools
AB Tasty, ThankYou.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for packaging products in Norway and Europe.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain registration trust analysis.
  4. Site uses modern technologies and third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  5. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers and published policies.
  6. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the INTERSHOP e-commerce platform and leverages modern JavaScript libraries and services such as Algolia for search, Google Tag Manager for analytics, AB Tasty for A/B testing, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preloads critical assets for performance. While the performance is moderate, there is room for optimization in loading speed and accessibility. The technical implementation reflects a mature digital infrastructure suitable for a large retail business. Opportunities exist to improve SEO and accessibility compliance further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rajapack.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rajapack.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.