Skip to main content

Security report for rajakt.ee

Raja K.T. OÜ · Energy · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raja K.T. OÜ is a well-established Estonian company specializing in wood chip production primarily for energy and industrial clients such as boiler houses, cogeneration plants, and furniture manufacturers. Founded in 1993, the company has grown to become one of the largest wood chip producers in Estonia, offering services including forestry management and wood residue collection. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, with clear business information and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates modern tools such as Google Tag Manager and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is good with HTTPS, security headers, and reCAPTCHA implemented, though explicit security policies and incident response information are not published. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained, supporting the company's market position effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching rajakt.ee

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the energy and manufacturing sectors, focusing on supplying biomass wood chips. Its business model is B2B, targeting industrial clients requiring sustainable biomass fuel. The website content and structure indicate a mature business with a stable market presence and a clear value proposition. The presence of certifications and detailed machinery information supports credibility. The company leverages digital tools for marketing and analytics but does not expose sensitive data or show signs of suspicious activity. Growth indicators include a large annual production volume and a skilled workforce. The multilingual site suggests an intent to serve broader regional markets.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced, appropriate security headers, and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response plan limits transparency. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could be improved to enhance security culture and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with best practices and improve user experience.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and third-party libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding terms of service to clarify user and client obligations and legal protections.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Raja K.T. OÜ
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raja K.T. OÜ
Description
Raja KT OÜ is a major Estonian producer of wood chips for boilers, cogeneration plants, and furniture industries. They purchase wood residues such as brushwood, logging residues, sawdust, and bark for chip production.
Key services
Wood chip production, Forestry management, Wood residue collection, Machinery services for forestry
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, PHP, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA, ct-ultimate-gdpr plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics via Google Tag Manager
Marketing tools
ct-ultimate-gdpr plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear business focus.
  2. Content is in Estonian with multilingual support (English, Latvian, Russian).
  3. Uses modern WordPress plugins and GDPR-compliant cookie consent.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity detected.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor for page building, supported by jQuery and various plugins for GDPR compliance and analytics. Performance is moderate with caching and minified CSS assets observed. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses Google services for fonts, maps, and analytics. The technical stack is standard for a professional corporate site, with opportunities to improve accessibility and security policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with rajakt.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rajakt.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.