Skip to main content

Security report for raja.fr

Raja SA · Retail · France

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raja SA is a leading European distributor specializing in packaging, supplies, and equipment for businesses. The company operates a professional B2B e-commerce platform targeting European businesses requiring packaging solutions, hygiene products, and related equipment. Raja holds a strong market position as a leader in its sector with a large-scale operation primarily based in France. Technically, the website leverages modern e-commerce infrastructure powered by INTERSHOP, enhanced with advanced search capabilities via Algolia, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, and Dynatrace RUM. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital presence. From a security perspective, Raja employs HTTPS with strong SSL configurations, uses reCAPTCHA for form protection, and manages cookie consent through OneTrust, demonstrating good security hygiene. However, the absence of a public security policy, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program indicates areas for improvement in transparency and security maturity. Overall, Raja presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with robust business credibility and technical implementation. The lack of WHOIS data slightly impacts domain trust but does not detract significantly from the overall positive assessment. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and formalizing incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raja.fr

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
35
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raja SA operates in the retail sector focusing on packaging and business supplies distribution across Europe. Its business model is B2B e-commerce, serving a wide range of industries requiring packaging solutions. The company benefits from a strong brand presence and a network of regional partner sites across multiple European countries, indicating a broad market reach. Raja's competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive product range, fast delivery (24/48 hours), and established reputation. The use of advanced digital marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. No parent company or subsidiaries were explicitly identified in the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of security headers, and protection of user input forms via Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent is managed in compliance with GDPR using OneTrust, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may affect user trust. The WHOIS data is missing, which is a minor concern for domain legitimacy. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing more security-related information and formalizing response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive security policy page accessible from the website footer.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  4. Include data protection officer contact details to improve GDPR transparency.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and integrations for security vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Raja SA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raja SA
Description
RAJA, le leader européen de la distribution d'emballages, de fournitures et d'équipements pour les entreprises répond à vos besoins ! LIVRAISON 24/48
Key services
Distribution of packaging, Supplies and equipment for businesses, Hygiene products, Cartons and boxes
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Algolia Search, Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, ThankYou.io, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Dynatrace RUM
Frameworks
React (implied by React app placeholder), Handlebars.js
Platforms
INTERSHOP e-commerce platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on login and password reset forms
  • Cookie consent management via OneTrust
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Dynatrace RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
AB Tasty
Tracking pixels
ThankYou.io
Marketing tools
AB Tasty, ThankYou.io
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge detected.
  2. Content is professional, well-structured, and targeted at B2B customers.
  3. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are in place.
  4. Multiple external trusted analytics and marketing tools are used.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not outweigh the professional presentation.
  6. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  8. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and address.
  9. Site uses modern e-commerce platform INTERSHOP and advanced search via Algolia.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the INTERSHOP e-commerce platform, utilizing modern JavaScript frameworks and libraries including React and Handlebars.js. It integrates Algolia for search functionality and employs Google Tag Manager, AB Tasty, and ThankYou.io for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with multiple deferred scripts and preloading strategies. The presence of Dynatrace RUM indicates active performance monitoring. No CMS other than INTERSHOP was detected. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional e-commerce experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raja.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raja.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.