The Rainham Group website currently serves as a placeholder announcing a forthcoming new website focused on commercial refrigeration and air conditioning services including maintenance, service, and installation. The business appears to target commercial clients requiring refrigeration and air conditioning solutions. The website content is minimal, with a single phone contact and no additional business or compliance information. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with Google Fonts but lacks modern CMS or frameworks. There is no evidence of HTTPS or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating a low digital maturity level. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a significant concern, suggesting either the domain is not registered or WHOIS information is withheld, which impacts trust and legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is weak with no visible best practices implemented.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
56
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention rainhamgroup.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for rainhamgroup.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The Rainham Group operates in the energy sector, specifically commercial refrigeration and air conditioning services. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on installation, maintenance, and servicing of commercial refrigeration systems. The website does not provide detailed information on market positioning or competitive advantages. The lack of digital presence and minimal content suggests a small-sized business possibly in early stages of digital transformation. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated beyond a link to the sitewizard.co.uk domain, likely a web hosting or design partner. Revenue streams and growth indicators cannot be assessed from the available data.
Security posture
The website exhibits a low security maturity level. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL/TLS encryption, no security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of WHOIS data further undermines trust and raises questions about domain legitimacy. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing immediate data protection risks but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet basic security and compliance standards.
Recommendations
Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure user connections and improve trust.
Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data practices.
Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance legitimacy.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to protect against common web attacks.
Develop a more complete website with clear business information, contact details, and compliance documentation to improve credibility and user trust.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
The Rainham Group
Description
Maintenance, Service, Installation Of Commercial Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
Key services
Maintenance, Service, Installation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Manrope)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
30/100
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is a placeholder with minimal content indicating a new website is coming soon.
No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
Only one contact phone number is provided with a clear call to action.
No email addresses or social media links present.
No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
No security headers or HTTPS status information available.
External links limited to Google Fonts and a partner site (sitewizard.co.uk).
WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and suspicious.
Website content is safe and business-focused with no adult or questionable content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built with basic HTML and CSS, utilizing Google Fonts for typography. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is minimalistic with limited content and no interactive elements such as forms. Performance is likely moderate given the simplicity, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no advanced responsive design features detected. SEO optimization is minimal, with only basic meta description and title tags. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating limited digital marketing or user behavior analysis capabilities. The lack of HTTPS and security headers represents a technical risk. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with rainhamgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review rainhamgroup.com.