Skip to main content

Security report for raiffeiseninformatik.at

Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH & Co KG · Finance · Austria

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raiffeisen Informatik GmbH & Co KG is a well-established IT service provider specializing in comprehensive IT solutions for financial and insurance sectors, with over 50 years of experience and a strong presence in Austria and neighboring countries. The company offers a broad range of services including data center operations, security services, IT consulting, and banking and insurance solutions. Their business model focuses on close collaboration with clients from planning through operation, supported by a large workforce and significant annual revenue. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Apache server infrastructure and uses Cloudflare for DNS, but critically lacks a valid SSL certificate, exposing it to security risks. Security headers are implemented, but without HTTPS the security posture is severely weakened. Privacy compliance is basic with no visible cookie consent or incident response information. Overall, the website is professional and content-rich, but the lack of HTTPS is a major security concern that must be addressed urgently.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raiffeiseninformatik.at

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
90
Email security
50
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the finance IT services sector, leveraging decades of experience and a large employee base. Their revenue and client base indicate a mature business with stable operations. The website highlights certifications and customer references, enhancing trust. The partnership with Firesys for financial reporting suggests integration with specialized financial tools. The company targets financial institutions and IT professionals, offering career opportunities and emphasizing quality and security. The absence of privacy and security policy details online may reflect an area for improvement in transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability for any modern website, especially one serving financial sector clients. While security headers such as CSP, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS are present, HSTS is ineffective without HTTPS. No evidence of incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policies was found. Cookie policies and consent mechanisms are missing, which may impact GDPR compliance. The site uses secure cookie flags but lacks modern TLS protocols and cipher suites. Immediate remediation is required to secure communications and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce HTTPS site-wide immediately.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Publish clear security policies including incident response and vulnerability disclosure information.
  5. Add a security.txt file with contact details for security issues.
  6. Regularly audit and update security headers and cookie settings.
  7. Enhance privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR compliance and data protection officer contact.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on a WordPress CMS with Apache server and uses jQuery for client-side scripting. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, but no DNSSEC validation is enabled. The site lacks SSL/TLS support, which is a critical technical deficiency. Performance data is unavailable, but the site appears mobile-optimized and uses responsive images. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. The technical stack is standard but requires urgent security upgrades to meet modern standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raiffeiseninformatik.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raiffeiseninformatik.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.