Skip to main content

Security report for raidrush.net

Raid-Rush · Media · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Raid-Rush is a German-language online community platform established in 2014, offering discussion forums, cryptocurrency price listings, and free online TV streaming. The platform targets general users interested in technology, crypto, and media streaming within the German-speaking market. The website is built on the XenForo forum software with a custom material design theme, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. Hosting and DNS services are provided by NameCheap and Cloudflare respectively, with HTTPS enforced for secure communications. Advertising revenue is generated through Google AdSense and other ad networks integrated with a GDPR-compliant consent management platform. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacking advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raidrush.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Raid-Rush operates as a niche community platform focusing on German-speaking users interested in cryptocurrencies and online media streaming. Its business model relies on community engagement through forums and content aggregation, monetized primarily via advertising. The platform maintains a consistent brand presence with active social media channels on Mastodon, Facebook, and Twitter. The domain age and registration data align with the business history, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of direct company contact emails or phone numbers and lack of published security or compliance certifications suggest a small to medium-sized operation with room for maturity in corporate transparency and security governance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC, lack of advanced HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, and no published security or incident response policies indicate moderate security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The platform would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and formal vulnerability disclosure process to improve incident response readiness and user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and ad networks to minimize tracking and security risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Raid-Rush
Description
Raid-Rush is an online platform providing forums, crypto coin listings, and free TV streaming services. It targets German-speaking users interested in technology, cryptocurrencies, and online media consumption.
Key services
Discussion forums, Cryptocurrency price listings, Free online TV streaming
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, XenForo forum software, Google Fonts (Roboto), Google AdSense, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
XenForo
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google AdSense, InMobi, Fuse
Tracking pixels
Google DoubleClick, InMobi CMP
Marketing tools
Consent Management Platform (CMP) by InMobi
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a German-language community forum with additional crypto and streaming content.
  2. Uses XenForo forum software with custom material theme.
  3. Has GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  5. No phone numbers or direct company emails publicly listed.
  6. Social media presence on Mastodon, Facebook, Twitter.
  7. No adult or NSFW content detected.
  8. Advertising is present via Google AdSense and other ad networks.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on XenForo forum software with jQuery and Google Fonts for UI enhancements. It integrates multiple advertising networks including Google AdSense and InMobi, managed via a Consent Management Platform to comply with GDPR. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate with some reliance on external scripts which may impact load times. The absence of DNSSEC and advanced security headers represents technical debt and potential risk. Overall, the infrastructure is adequate for a small to medium community platform but could be improved with enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raidrush.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raidrush.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.