Skip to main content

Security report for radut.net

Dr. Radut Consulting · Healthcare · Romania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Radut Consulting is a specialized consulting firm offering medical, management, marketing, IT, and wellness services primarily targeting healthcare and business clients. The company leverages Lean Six Sigma methodologies and acts as a Third Party Administrator (TPA) under the Call AID™ brand. Their digital presence is built on Drupal CMS with a professional and content-rich website that supports multi-language navigation and provides clear contact information. The website integrates modern web technologies and includes cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit privacy and terms of service pages. Technically, the site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate and security headers are not detected. The WHOIS data is incomplete, lacking registrar and registrant details, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. However, the website content and external partnerships indicate a legitimate business operation. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in HTTP security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic, with cookie consent but no visible privacy policy. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radut.net

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the healthcare and technology consulting sectors with a small business size and a founding year of 2003. It targets businesses and professionals needing consulting in healthcare operations, management, IT services, and wellness solutions. The business model combines consulting services with proprietary intellectual property and wellness product offerings. Partnerships with LifeWave and Lean Six Sigma associations enhance credibility. The website serves as a key marketing and informational platform, supporting client engagement through contact forms and social media channels. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving digital trust signals.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes antibot mechanisms in forms and a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of basic security and privacy practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. The incomplete WHOIS data and lack of registrant information present a risk factor. No known vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to enhance security posture and stakeholder confidence.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Radut Consulting
Description
Dr. Radut provides expert medical, management, and IT consulting to drive business success and promote innovation. Services include medical consulting, management & marketing consulting, IT services, Call AID™ TPA, LifeWave wellness products, and intellectual property management.
Key services
Medical consulting, Management & marketing consulting, Information technology services, Call AID™ TPA services, LifeWave wellness products, Intellectual property management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, AddToAny sharing, FlexSlider
Frameworks
Drupal
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of antibot keys in forms
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
AddToAny sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data is incomplete or unavailable, raising some trust concerns.
  4. Website uses Drupal CMS with modern web technologies.
  5. Cookie consent banner present with opt-in mechanism.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided with phone numbers and addresses.
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Drupal.org.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Security headers and policies are minimal or not detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal CMS, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and FlexSlider for UI components. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking, alongside AddToAny for social sharing. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate, with some images loaded lazily and others eager. The site uses antibot keys in forms to prevent spam. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy/security documentation, which are areas for technical improvement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radut.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radut.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.