Skip to main content

Security report for radiostudio.be

Radiostudio.be · Media · Belgium

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Radiostudio.be is a specialized Belgian company focused on the rental and sale of radio broadcast equipment and software, including mobile studios and consultancy services. They hold exclusive partnerships with notable brands such as mAirlist and Lawo, serving a diverse client base including major broadcasters and European institutions. The website presents a professional image with good content quality and consistent branding, targeting media professionals and broadcasters primarily in Belgium. Technically, the site uses basic modern web technologies like HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and integrates Facebook social plugins, but lacks advanced CMS or frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. Security posture is moderate with some best practices like HTTPS assumed but lacks critical security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the domain WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional and credible but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching radiostudio.be

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media and technology sectors, providing essential broadcast equipment and services to radio stations and media outlets. Their business model combines equipment rental, sales, and consultancy, supported by exclusive partnerships that enhance their market position. The client list includes prominent broadcasters and European institutions, indicating strong market presence and trust. The website references a partner domain (tomcallebaut.be) for a broader portfolio, suggesting a partnership ecosystem. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving digital presence. Revenue streams likely come from equipment rental, sales, and support contracts. The company targets professional broadcasters and event organizers, positioning itself as a niche expert in radio broadcast technology.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The contact form includes client-side validation but lacks visible server-side protections like CSRF tokens. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating GDPR compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, reducing transparency and preparedness. The use of Facebook SDK introduces third-party tracking but no analytics services were found. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement in policy publication, header implementation, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is properly configured and enforced site-wide with strong SSL/TLS settings.
  4. Add server-side validation and CSRF protection for all forms to prevent injection and forgery attacks.
  5. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure procedures to improve transparency and security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Radiostudio.be
Description
Radiostudio.be is a company specializing in rental and sales of radio equipment, including studio hardware, broadcast software, and mobile radio studios. They offer services such as installation, consultancy, and support for radio stations and broadcasters. They are exclusive Belgian distributors for mAirlist software and certified partners for Lawo mixing consoles.
Key services
Rental of radio and TV broadcast equipment, Sales of radio studio hardware and software, Mobile radio studio for live location broadcasts, Consultancy and installation services, Support for mAirlist software, Certified Lawo mixing console partner
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, skrollr.js, Facebook SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed but not confirmed from data)
  • Form input validation via JavaScript

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook SDK
Marketing tools
Facebook social plugins
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is only via a contact form; no explicit email or phone contacts provided.
  4. Use of Facebook social plugins indicates some social media integration.
  5. No advanced security headers or policies detected.
  6. Content is business-focused and relevant to radio broadcast equipment and services.
  7. Technical implementation uses basic modern web technologies but lacks CMS or advanced frameworks.
  8. No analytics or tracking services detected beyond Facebook SDK.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information present.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, using the skrollr.js library for parallax scrolling effects and Facebook SDK for social media integration. No CMS or advanced frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Performance is moderate with some large background images and fixed-position elements that may impact load times. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no advanced responsive design frameworks. Accessibility features are minimal, with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords but no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data. The site lacks modern technical enhancements such as HTTP/2 hints, lazy loading, or progressive web app features. Overall, the technical stack is functional but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with radiostudio.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review radiostudio.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.