Skip to main content

Security report for raco.lv

SIA Raco · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Raco is a Latvian construction and renovation company specializing in facade insulation, renovation, crack reinforcement by injection, waterproofing, and other interior and exterior finishing works. The company targets local clients in Latvia seeking professional building services. The website presents a professional image with clear contact details and service descriptions, positioning itself as a reliable regional service provider. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including HTTPS, service workers, and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Snowplow, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Privacy compliance is addressed through a Usercentrics consent management platform and a dedicated privacy policy page. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and cookie consent, but lacks advanced security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching raco.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the construction sector focusing on facade and interior finishing services. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting residential and commercial clients in Latvia. The website indicates a small-sized enterprise with a local market focus. The presence of Google My Business and clear contact information supports local trust and customer engagement. The company appears to have a straightforward operational model without complex partnerships or subsidiaries. The website is maintained by a Latvian web development company, indicating local digital support. No evidence of certifications or advanced business partnerships was found.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a service worker, which enhances security and performance. Cookie consent is managed via a reputable CMP (Usercentrics), supporting GDPR compliance. However, the site lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. No incident response contacts or abuse emails are provided. The use of third-party analytics and scripts is standard but should be regularly audited for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with additional headers and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance web security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Raco
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Raco
Description
Fasāžu siltināšana, renovācija un apdare, plaisu nostiprināšana ar injekciju metodi, hidroizolācija un citi iekšējie un ārējie apdares/celtniecības darbi.
Key services
Facade insulation, Facade renovation and finishing, Crack reinforcement by injection method, Waterproofing, Interior and exterior finishing/construction works
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Usercentrics CMP, Google Analytics (gtag.js), PhotoSwipe, Skrollr, Service Worker, Mapbox (token present), Friendly Captcha, Snowplow Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service worker registered
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Snowplow
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Snowplow
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with service worker and modern JS libraries.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  5. Contact information is clearly displayed with phone, email, and physical address.
  6. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. Site content is relevant to construction and renovation services in Latvia.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Google Analytics and Snowplow used for analytics tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a CMS platform likely Multiscreensite, using jQuery 3.7.0 and modern JavaScript libraries such as Skrollr and PhotoSwipe for UI effects. It employs a service worker for offline support and performance improvements. Google Analytics and Snowplow are used for user behavior tracking, integrated with a Usercentrics CMP for privacy compliance. The site loads CSS and JS asynchronously to optimize performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, no advanced frameworks or server-side technologies are evident from the client-side code. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and SEO metadata completeness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with raco.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review raco.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.