Skip to main content

Security report for quickswap.exchange

QuickSwap · Finance · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

72/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

QuickSwap is a leading decentralized exchange (DEX) and DeFi ecosystem primarily operating on Polygon and Base chains, with extensions to other EVM-compatible blockchains. It offers a comprehensive suite of services including token swapping, liquidity provision, farming, staking, and decentralized perpetual trading with leverage. The platform targets cryptocurrency traders and DeFi users seeking fast, low-cost transactions and a broad multi-chain experience. QuickSwap positions itself as a major player in the Polygon ecosystem with a strong community and partner network. Technically, QuickSwap leverages modern web technologies such as React and Next.js, hosted likely behind Cloudflare infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and mobile optimization. The site integrates analytics tools like Google Analytics and Cloudflare Insights for user behavior tracking. The platform demonstrates good technical maturity with a clean, professional design and effective SEO practices. From a security perspective, QuickSwap enforces HTTPS and follows several best practices, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts are not clearly presented. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates areas for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in the crypto space, and does not raise immediate trust concerns. Overall, QuickSwap presents a professional, trustworthy DeFi platform with strong market positioning and technical infrastructure. Enhancements in privacy compliance, security disclosures, and user contact transparency would further strengthen its security posture and regulatory alignment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quickswap.exchange

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
70
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
72

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

QuickSwap operates in the competitive DeFi sector, focusing on Polygon and other EVM chains to provide decentralized trading and liquidity services. Its business model revolves around facilitating token swaps, liquidity pools, farming incentives, and leveraged perpetual trading, generating revenue through trading fees and protocol incentives. The platform targets active crypto traders, liquidity providers, and DeFi enthusiasts, leveraging partnerships with projects like Flare and Kava to expand its ecosystem. QuickSwap's multi-chain approach and integration of fiat on-ramps position it well for growth and user acquisition. The presence of a gaming hub and leaderboard indicates community engagement strategies. The company maintains a strong open-source presence via GitHub and comprehensive documentation, supporting developer adoption and ecosystem growth.

Security posture

QuickSwap demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforcement and use of modern frameworks reducing common vulnerabilities. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as X-Content-Type-Options and Referrer-Policy, absence of a published security incident response plan or contact, and missing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represent gaps in security transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific disclosures. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the platform is secure but would benefit from enhanced security governance and compliance documentation to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and display explicit security headers including X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, and Content-Security-Policy.
  2. Publish a clear security incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  3. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  4. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
QuickSwap
Description
QuickSwap is the leading DEX on all Polygon chains and live on Base Chain: it's all-in-one DeFi hub offers the best rates for traders, rewards for liquidity providers and farms, decentralised perpetual trades, staking, and more across multiple EVM chains.
Key services
Token swapping, Liquidity provision, Farming, Perpetual trading, Staking, Fiat on-ramp
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Cloudflare Insights, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web, Polygon, Base Chain, Immutable zkEVM, Ethereum, Manta Pacific L2, Soneium, Somnia, DogeChain, X Layer
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript frameworks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional DeFi platform focused on Polygon and other EVM chains.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. Privacy and terms of service pages exist but cookie policy and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms are missing.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools is evident.
  6. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected or unavailable, typical for crypto projects.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. The use of Cloudflare Insights and Google Analytics indicates robust user tracking and performance monitoring. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based solution. Hosting appears to be via Cloudflare or similar CDN, enhancing global availability and DDoS protection. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though some improvements in accessibility and security headers could be made to reduce technical debt and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quickswap.exchange. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quickswap.exchange.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.