Skip to main content

Security report for quickpay.net

Quickpay · Finance · Denmark

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Quickpay is a well-established payment service provider founded in 1999, offering flexible and scalable online payment solutions to over 30,000 merchants with more than 4 million transactions processed monthly. The company provides a comprehensive product portfolio including payment method integrations, API access for developers, and a partner program, positioning itself as a reliable player in the European fintech and e-commerce market. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging technologies such as Hugo for static site generation, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, ensuring good performance, accessibility, and SEO optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, clientTransferProhibited domain status, and cookie consent mechanisms, although DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Overall, Quickpay demonstrates high business credibility and technical maturity with minor areas for improvement in security transparency and DNS security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching quickpay.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Quickpay operates in the finance and technology sectors, targeting merchants and businesses requiring online payment processing. Its business model centers on providing payment gateway services and integrations with popular e-commerce platforms like Shopify, WooCommerce, and Magento. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem and a parent company relationship with Unzer, enhancing its market position. Revenue streams likely include transaction fees, subscription pricing, and partner program commissions. The website's content and branding are consistent and professional, supporting a medium-sized enterprise profile with a focus on European markets, particularly Denmark and neighboring countries.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses clientTransferProhibited status to protect domain transfers. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot with TCFv2.2 compliance, indicating GDPR awareness. No security.txt or explicit security policy pages were found, and DNSSEC is not enabled, representing minor security gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and LinkedIn Insight is standard but requires ongoing monitoring. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Create and publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Quickpay
Description
Accept payments online with Quickpay. Get started in just a few minutes with our secure and flexible payment solutions.
Key services
Online payment processing, Payment method integrations, API for custom integrations, Partner program
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, eyeAble accessibility tool, AWS DNS hosting
Frameworks
TCFv2.2 (for consent management)
Platforms
Google Fonts, AWS Route 53 DNS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of clientTransferProhibited status to prevent unauthorized domain transfer

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Cookiebot, LinkedIn Insight
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on payment services.
  3. Strong use of modern technologies and compliance tools like Cookiebot.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with multiple channels.
  5. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  6. No explicit privacy officer contact found.
  7. Domain WHOIS data supports legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, ensuring fast load times and good performance. It integrates modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features, including the eyeAble accessibility tool. SEO is well implemented with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. The technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional online presence with minimal technical debt.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with quickpay.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review quickpay.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.